Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Table 2. - Summary of snow storm periods sampled by the volunteer network near Albany, New York, <br />during the 1995-96 winter. Activation refers to whether part or all of network was requested to make <br />Sand SD observations (see text). <br /> <br />Event Start date-hour (UTC)* Stop date-hour (UTC) Activation <br />No. <br />1 01 Dec-03 01 Dec-2l Partial <br />2 09 Dec-06 10 Dec-09 Full <br />3 14 Dec-09 15 Dec-06 Partial <br />4 19 Dec-18 21 Dec-06 Full <br />5 02 Jan-12 04 Jan-12 Full <br />6 07 Jan-12 09 Jan-OO Partial <br />7 12 Jan-15 13 Jan-15 Full <br />8 16 Feb-13 17 Feb-13 Full <br />9 02 Mar-09 02 Mar-21 Partial <br />10 05 Mar-06 06 Mar-06 Full <br />11 06 Mar-2l 09 Mar-OO Full <br />12 29 Mar-03 29 Mar-18 Partial <br />13 09 Apr-20 11 Apr-OO Partial <br />* UTC = universal time coordinated <br /> <br />Not all volunteers were available during each storm, and the times during which each <br />volunteer was able to take measurements varied from storm to storm to account for sleep <br />time. During storms with full network activation, about 40 to 50 volunteers made hourly <br />observations. Of course, specific measurement locations varied from storm to storm <br />depending upon the availability of particular observers. <br /> <br />Volunteer observations were collected at the Albany WFO, entered into a computer data base <br />by university students and, at this writing, are being double-checked for accuracy . by <br />comparison with nearby observations. In addition, two Belfort Universal gages were operated <br />during the latter part of the winter at the locations shown in table 1. As with all Belfort <br />gages used in this study, the two near Albany were equipped with Alter wind shields. The <br />Albany gages were located in protected clearings in the forest. <br /> <br />The standard mode of clutter suppression with the Albany WSR-88D during storms of the <br />past winter was to always use the Clutter Bypass Map and moderate suppression (personal <br />communication with John Quinlan). No operator-designated boxes with zero suppression <br />were attempted near Albany because of complex terrain and corresponding widespread <br />ground clutter. <br /> <br />To date, no analysis of the Albany radar and snowboard data has been undertaken. <br /> <br />3.3. Denver, Colorado, Observations <br /> <br />Snow measurement sites within range of the Denver radar were selected by Reclamation <br />meteorologists after consideration of several factors to be discussed, including examination <br />of maps and considerable on-the-ground searching. The Denver area provides both prairie <br />locations, chiefly affected by upslope storms, and mountain locations affected by various <br />storm types. <br /> <br />6 <br />