Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\:..,ji <br /> <br />It <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />and the Ute Mountain Ute Tribe equivalent to those that the Tribes would have received <br />under the 1988 Settlement Act, thet congressional act incorporated into the 1991 Consent <br />Decrees. See Applicant's Ex. I (2000 Settlement Act Amendments). Congress <br />specifically found that the 2000 Settlement Act Amendments ensure that the federal <br />commitments made to the Tribes in the 1988 Settlement Act are honored. Applicant's <br />Ex. I (2000 Settlement Act Amendments) at ~ 301(b)(9). The Ute Tribes, the State of <br />Colorado, and the Southwestern Water Conservation District supported the 2000 <br />Settlement Act Amendments and are signatories to the Stipulations to Amend filed in W- <br />1603-76F and W-1603-76J. <br /> <br />j <br />" <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />> ~ <br /> <br />33. The core purpose of the settlement resulting in an act of Congress and <br />ultimately in this court's entry of the" 1991 Consent Decrees was resolution of the Federal <br />reserved water rights claims of the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe and the Southern Ute <br />Indian Tribe. See Applicant's Ex. 13 (1988 Settlement Act) at Sec. 2. This purpose <br />continues to b,e central under the current amending legislation. Applicant's Ex. 1 (2000 <br />Settlement Act Amendments). See Mar. 7 Order at 10. <br /> <br />34. The 2000 Settlement Act Amendments show that the congressionally- <br />approved changes were intended to meet the requirements ofvarious federal <br />enviromnentallaws, fmdings, and decisions while ensuring full and final settlement of <br />the water rights claims of the Ute Tribes on the Animas and La Plata Rivers. See <br />Applicant's Ex. 1 (2000 Settlement Act Amendments) at g 301(b). <br /> <br />35. The proposed amendments to the 1991 Consent Decrees and the Change <br />Applications accomplish three key goals of the 2000 Settlement Act Amendments by 1) <br />changing the description of the Ute Tribes' water rights set forth in the 1991 Consent <br />Decrees to be consistent with operation ofthe ALP as set forth in the 2000 Settlement <br />Act Amendments; 2) deleting agricultural irrigation use of the Ute Tribes' water rights, <br />and replacing it with municipal and industrial uses, and 3) extending the deadlines by <br />which the settlement of the Ute Tribes' pending reserved and appropriative water rights <br />claims on the Animas and La Plata Rivers shall become final. <br /> <br />36. The Stipulations to Amend and Chaitge Applications are designed to <br />implement the amendments to the 1986 Settlement Agreement as approved by Congress. <br />See Applicant's Ex. 1 (2000 Settlement Act Amendments); Stipulations to Amend; <br />Change Applications. Consequently, the proposed modifications are suitably tailored to <br />the changed circwnstances to this extent. See also Applicant's Ex. 11 (ROD) at 1-3; 19 <br />(Sen. Rep. 106-513). <br /> <br />B. ALP Decrees <br /> <br />37. The storage right and diversion amount for ALP are set forth in the ALP <br />Decrees. Testimony of Bruce Whitehead, Division Engineer for the State Engineer's <br />Office; see CPA Ex. RR.-18, RR-19, RR-33. The 1991 Consent Decree provide each <br />Tribe with a water supply from ALP. Testimony of Mr. Whitehead; see Applicant's Ex. <br />2&3 (1991 Consent Decree) at '~6.A.i. &7.A.i. The water supply provided each Tribe by <br /> <br />14 <br />