My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC12924
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSPC12924
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:46:24 PM
Creation date
4/21/2008 11:51:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.400.31.F
Description
Avon RICD
State
CO
Title
Related Reports
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Settlement Act Amendments); 6 (1996 FSFES); 7 (1998 Admin. Proposal); 10 (2000 <br />FSEIS); and 11 (ROD). <br /> <br />21. As a result of this effort, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation ("BOR") <br />selected "Refmed Alternative 4" ("RA4H) to implement the Colorado Ute Indian Water <br />Rights Settlement Act of 1988 (1988 Settlernent). Applicant's Ex. 10 (2000 FSEIS); 11 <br />(ROD). The structural components ofRA4 include an off-stream reservoir of 120,000 <br />AF capacity; a 280 cis pumping plant on the Animas River (the Durango Pumping Plant); <br />a pipeline from the pumping plant to the reservoir; and a pipeline to transport M&I water <br />to the Sbiprock area for the benefit of the Navajo Nation. RA4 does not include any <br />structural components to convey water for actual use by the Ute Tribes. Applicant's Ex. <br />10 (2000 FSEIS) at 2.1.1.2 <br /> <br />22. In late 2000, Congress approved the 2000 Settlement Act Amendments to <br />amend the 1988 Settlement Act and provide for an alternative approach to finalize the <br />Ute Tribes' settlement of its reserved water rights claims on the Animas and La Plata <br />Rivers. Applicant's Ex. 1 (2000 Settlement Act Amendments). The settlement is based <br />upon a modified ALP and substitute benefits provided to the Ute Tribes. ld. The 2000 <br />Settlement Act Amendments are consistent with RA4. <br /> <br />23 _ All agricultural water was removed from the settlement, with the modified <br />ALP water to be used only for municipal and industrial ("M&I") uses. Applicant's Ex. 1 <br />(2000 Settlement Act Amendments) at ~ 302. Absent further express congressional <br />authorization, "other project features authorized by Public Law 90-537 [An Act to <br />authorize the construction, operation, and maintenance of the Colorado River Basin <br />project, and for other purposes] shaH not be commenced." Id. at ~ 302(a)(1)( C)(i). <br /> <br />24. Congress also determined that the decision to amend the original <br />settlement and related ALP construction delays necessitated an extension of time for the <br />Ute Tribes to decide whether to commence litigation ofthe Tribal claims. Applicant's <br />Ex. I (2000 Settlement Act Amendments) at ~ 303( c)(Sec. 18). <br /> <br />25. Section 18(c) of the 2000 Settlernent Act Amendments (Applicant's Ex. 1) <br />directed the Attorney General to file with this court "such instruments as may be <br />necessary to request the court to amend the final consent decree to provide for the <br />Amendments made to this Act under the [2000 Settlement Act Amendments]." <br /> <br />26. The Court takes judicial notice of the fact that ALP is being constructed, <br />and at the time this decree is entered, is approximately 40% complete. <br /> <br />C. The Proposed Amendments to the 1991 Consent Decrees and <br />Pl"oposed Changes Sought in the Change Applications. <br /> <br />27. Moving Parties ask this Court to make the following amendments to <br /> <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.