Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />program, then sent the revised program to Auburn. This work <br />was successful as indicated by a duplicate test run on both <br />NAWC and Bureau computers which yielded the same results. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2.4 SCPP-1 1983 Data Analysis. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />NAWC had originally intended to provide statisti.cal and <br />- case study ana-lysis of the 1983 _SCPP randomized experimental <br />units. This was not accomplished since only one experimental <br />unit was obtained due to the extremely wet winter and the <br />resultant numerous suspensions in randomized seeding research. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2.5 suspension Criteria. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Bureau personnel consulted with one of NAWC's subcontractor I s, <br />Sierra Hydrotech, concerning the snow'pack accumulation suspension <br />criteria developed previously. The criteria for suspension <br />has been based upon snowpack accumulation exceeding 180 percent <br />of average for the given date expressed as a percentage of <br />average April 1 water content for the American Ri.ver Basin. <br />The cutoff values are given in Ta.ble 2.6. The Americcln River <br />Basin snowpack index is calculated by the snow survey p rog ram <br />of the California Department of Water Resources. The index <br />as of the first of the month may be updated weeklYr using <br />data on snowpack water accumulation from snow sensors. Those <br />snowcourse locations utilized in the calculation of the basin <br />wide index are provided in Table 2.7. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />2-15 <br /> <br />. <br />