My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00443
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00443
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:17 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:02:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
An Investigation of Precipitating Ice Crystals from Natural and Seeded Winter Orographic Clouds
Date
11/18/1974
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~--.-_. ~-f <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2. Typical Frame from the Photographic <br />Ice Crystal Replicator <br /> <br />The photographic replicator was <br />positioned at the highway maintenance area about <br />one mile east of the summit on Wolf Creek Pass. <br />The elevation of this location is 10.660 feet. <br />Care was taken to locate the instrument with <br />good exposure at the highway camp. <br /> <br />A total of eleven storms have been <br />analyzed for the winters of 1972-73 and 1973-74. <br />Data from at least twice this many storms were <br />collected but have not been included in the final <br />summary because of instrumental problems or <br />uncertainties about representativeness. Seven <br />of the eleven storms analyzed were natural storms <br />with no seeding and four storms were seeded. Of <br />the four seeded storms only one is unquestionably <br />a seeded case. Ice crystal data were available <br />only for a few hours at the beginning or ending <br />of seeding for two of the storms and no evidence <br />was obtained either from research aircraft or <br />ground ice nucleus counters that artificial ice <br />nuclei were present over Wolf Creek Pass for a <br />third storm. However. the storm on February 19. <br />1974 was obviously seeded and the effects were <br />clearly evident in the ice crystal characteristics. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />ANALYSIS PROCEDURES <br /> <br />The replicator films were analyzed by <br />projection onto a calibrated screen. Ice crystals <br />were classified into five categories of crystal <br />type - plates. columns. dendrites. irregulars. <br />and graupel. Four categories of rime were used <br />none. light. moderate. and heavy. In addition <br />to the crystal type and rime classifications. <br />each crystal was measured for size to the nearest <br />100 microns. The maximum dimension was used and <br />called the crystal diameter. Particles less than <br />50 microns were not counted as ice crystals <br />because it was impossible to distinguish a crystal <br />less than 50 microns from the nap on the black <br />velvet belt. The entire frame was not always <br />reduced due to occasional unequal lighting on the <br />film. The screen was gridded into equivalent <br />5-mm blocks on the film. A total of 36 blocks <br />almost filled a frame. and from 10 to 36 of these <br />blocks were reduced for each frame depending on <br />the quality of the data. <br /> <br />The following equation was used to <br />compute concentration in number per liter: <br /> <br />~i"'------ <br /> <br />. ..;5iiiiiIii J_,,~k.~ <br />~_... <br /> <br />C .. <br /> <br />n <br />\ B N S <br />L W ViK A <br />i=l <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />where: <br /> <br />C concentration of 3rystals (No./liter) <br />B constant (1000 cm /liter) <br />N number of crystal analyzed (1 crystal) <br />S speed of velvet belt(cm/sec) <br />W = slit width of settling area (em) <br />V = fall velocity of ice crystal (em/see) <br />Ki= number of blocks reduced ~blocks) <br />A area of block reduced (em /block) <br />n total number of crystals analyzed <br /> <br />The concentration for each frame was <br />obtained by summing the concentration of each <br />crystal in the frame. The fall velocity equations <br />for unrimed plates. columns. and dendrites were <br />obtained from Brown (1970). No suitable fall <br />velocity equation exists for irregular crystals <br />since they are such a mixture of different forms. <br />Most irregular crystals are fairly compact and <br />probably have a reasonably high fall velocity; <br />therefore. the same equation was used for irregulars <br />as used for capped columns. The graupel equation <br />comes from Zikmunda and Vali (1972) for their <br />March 10, 1971 case. This particular equation <br />was used because the size of graupel at Wolf <br />Creek Pass best matched this case. Only one <br />equation was used for graupel because it was <br />always classified into a heavy-rime category. <br />However, all other crystals could vary in the <br />degree of rime. Very little, if any. work has <br />been done to develop fall velocity equations which <br />vary with the degree of rime, although it is <br />evident that greater amounts of rime increase <br />the fall velocity. Consequently, a qualitative <br />assessment was made of the fall velocity by riming. <br />For plates, columns, and dendrites. the fall ~elocity <br />was increased over the no rime category 10 percent <br />for light rime. 50 percent for moderate rime. and <br />100 percent for heavy rime. The fall velocity <br />for irregulars was only increased 10 percent for <br />light rime, 30 percent for moderate rime, and <br />50 percent for heavy rime because these crystals <br />have fairly high fall velocities even without rime <br />and should remain below the fall velocity for <br />graupel which is the extreme. The error in <br />concentration due to an error in fall velocity is <br />not serious compared to other problems. If the <br />fall velocity is in error by 100 percent, the <br />concentration will be in error by a factor of two. <br />which is small compared to many other assumptions <br />and errors. <br /> <br />Data were obtained for all storms at <br />I-minute intervals. Large, short-term variations <br />were evident in the concentrations, so a running <br />mean over a 5-minute interval was used to smooth the <br />data. In addition to the concentration-with-time <br />calculations, an average concentration was obtained <br />for each storm. Since space is limited in this <br />paper only the average concentration per storm <br />will be presented. <br /> <br />For comparison of crystal concentrations <br />with expected cloud-top ice nucleus concentrations, <br />the cloud-top temperature and the natural ice <br />nucleus spectrum must be known. The following <br />method was used to determine cloud top and thus <br />cloud-top temperature, The special Pagosa Springs <br />and Durango soundings conducted for the Colorado <br />River Basin Pilot Project nearest in time to the <br /> <br />469 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.