My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00442
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00442
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:17 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:02:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Model of Hygroscopic Seeding in Cumulus Clouds
Date
12/12/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1762 <br /> <br />'5.00 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 17 <br /> <br />em =23.20 C <br />BASE=3 km <br />M. R. = 11.3g kg-I <br /> <br />12.00 <br /> <br />200JJ.m <br /> <br /> <br />- <br />E <br />= 9.00 <br />:J: <br />t- <br />o.. <br />W <br />o <br />o <br />::> <br />o 6.00 <br />..J <br />U <br /> <br />:::t <br />::> <br />:::t <br />z <br />i 3.00 <br /> <br />12.00 18.00 <br />UPDRAFT (m ,-oj <br /> <br />24.00 <br /> <br />FIG. 2. Variation of the minimum cloud depth required for <br />a particle to grow large enough to begin to fall through the <br />cloud as a function of updraft speed for initial' hygroscopic <br />drop diameters of 5-400 pm (model computations). <br /> <br />high enough to freeze and subsequently grow large <br />enough to fall through the updraft and emerge at the <br />melting level as 1-,3 cm hailstones. However, many <br />more precipitation particles would be produced by <br />the 40 and 100 }Lm seeds, which would undergo drop <br />breakup three and six times, respectively, prior to <br />freezing. - <br />Fig. 1f illustrates the very strong updraft case <br />(25 m S-l). As would be expected, the smaller seeds <br />are all ejected out the top of the cloud, whereas the <br />100 and 200 }Lm seeds grow large enough to fall back <br />through the updraft as hail. <br />The same general pattern is apparent for higher <br />based clouds such as are found in the Great Plains <br />regions. However, since these clouds have lower liquid <br />water contents, the particles take a higher trajectory <br />above cloud base to grow large enough to fall out, <br />and therefore require a greater cloud depth. Fig. 19 <br />illustrates this point well: The same in-cloud moist <br />adiabatic temperature was used as in the preceding <br />example, but a higher cloud base (3 km) was assumed. <br />Comparing this graph with Fig. 1c (both are for <br />5 m S-l updrafts), it can be seen that the particles <br />travel 200-700 m higher above cloud base in the <br />high-base situation. <br />Quite a dramatic change is apparent in the high- <br />base situation compared to the low when updraft <br />speeds are 10 m S-l and greater. Since the hydro- <br />meteors travel into colder regions sooner in the high- <br />base clouds, they become ice particles earlier in the <br />growth stage. A large-drop accumulation wne was <br />shown to occur in Fig. 1d for all but the 5 }Lm hy- <br />groscopic seed. However, in the high cloud-base <br /> <br />30.00 <br /> <br />situation (as illustrated in Fig. 1h), all seeds of initial <br />size of 40 }Lm or smaller freeze prior to reaching water <br />breakup size. In this case all seeds larger than 100 }Lm <br />initial size would grow large enough to break up and <br />float near a balance level. These characteristics are <br />further accentuated in the colder cloud cases. Figs. 1i <br />and 1j illustrate computer runs for an in-cloud moist <br />adiabatic temperature of 160C, a 3 km cloud base, <br />and updraft speeds of 5 and 15 m s-\ respectively. <br />Notice the much lower liquid water content values <br />and lower temperatures, which account for the absence <br />of a drop breakup' wne in Fig. 1i. It also accounts <br />for all the seeds 5-40 }Lm being blown out the top <br />of the cloud with a 15 m S-l updraft (see Fig. 1j). <br />For the same updraft speed but more moist. cloud <br />conditions these same size particles grew large enough <br />to fall back to cloudbase (see Fig. 1e). <br /> <br />b. Syntheses of case studies <br /> <br />A large number of graphs were generated by the <br />computer model for various initial conditions. Certain <br />patterns are apparent from which specific conclusions <br />can be drawn: <br /> <br />1) For a given updraft speed, 'the smaller initial- <br />size hygroscopic particles require a greater cloud depth <br />to grow large enough to start falling through the cloud. <br />Fig. 2 illustrates this fact well. For instance, about <br />2 km more cloud depth is required at 5 m S-l updraft <br />for a 5 }Lm seed compared with a 40 }Lm one. Notice <br />also that the smaller seeds pass through the top of <br />the cloud much more readily. At 15 m S-l updraft <br />speed, a 5 }Lm seed passes through the top (16 km <br />summit), whereas a 40 }Lm seed would start falling <br />through the cloud at 7 km above cloud base. <br /> <br />15.00 <br /> <br />- 8m=23.20C BASE=lkm M.R.=IG.2g kg-' <br />8m=23,20C BASE=3km M.R.=11.3g kg-I <br />....... 8m = ,Go C BASE= 3 km M.R.= 5.9 9 kg-I <br /> <br />12.00 <br /> <br />51'm <br /> <br /> <br />E <br />.:::. 9.00 <br />:r: <br />I- <br />0.. <br />W <br />o <br />o <br />:> <br />o 6.00 <br />..J <br />U <br /> <br />:;; <br />:> <br />:;; <br />z <br />i 3.00 <br /> <br />'24.00 <br /> <br />-.J <br />30.00 <br /> <br />12.00 <br /> <br />18.00 <br /> <br />UPDRAFT 1m s''i <br /> <br />FIG. 3. As in Fig. 2 except for drop diameters of 5 and 40 }.1m <br />and for cloud conditions ranging from cold and relatively dry <br />to warm and moist (model computations). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.