My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00439
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00439
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:16 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:02:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
HIPLEX-1: Experimental Design and Response Variables
Date
4/4/1984
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />APRIL 1984 <br /> <br />SMITH ET AL. <br /> <br />499 <br /> <br />an open-ended process because the number of possible <br />scenarios is boundless. <br /> <br />3. The experimental unit <br /> <br />The designated experimental unit for HIPLEX-l <br />was the small semi-isolated cumulus congestus cloud <br />(Fig. 1). It was the only type of cloud that was thought <br />to be well-enough understood to permit the design of <br />a physically meaningful randomized seeding experi- <br />ment. Clouds were sought that had diameters from <br />-2 to 8 km and depths from 2.5 to 4.5 km, and that <br />were visually distinct and separable from neighboring <br />cumulus congestus clouds. The desired cloud base <br />temperature was about +50C, with cloud top tem- <br />perature preferably no lower than -12oC. Other de- <br />sired conditions included cloud liquid water concen- <br />trations of -1 g m - 3, low concentrations of ice particles <br />around the -lOoC level, the absence of any radar echo, <br />and a cloud lifetime of about one-half hour after treat- <br />ment. These general conditions were, on the basis of <br />the exploratory studies and trial seeding experiments <br />carried out prior to the beginning of the randomized <br />seeding experiment, expected to lead to a sample of <br />clouds that would be amenable to seeding according <br />to the HIPLEX-l physical hypothesis (Section 5). Table <br />I presents detailed objective criteria that were adopted <br />to quantify these general conditions for cloud selection <br />in HIPLEX-l. These quantities were measured by the <br />project aircraft, as described below. <br />The test-case clouds were classified as Class A-I, A- <br /> <br />2, or B. Weak to moderate updrafts were required for <br />Class A-I clouds, the primary category for which the <br />experimental hypothesis was developed. Class A-I <br />clouds were considered unlikely to precipitate naturally <br />because of warm tops (-6 to -12oC) at the time of <br />selection and a presumed absence of ice multiplication <br />processes. Class A-2 clouds were clouds in the same <br />temperature range but in which an ice multiplication <br />process was considered likely to occur. (The criteria <br />for Class A-2 clouds were based on observations during <br />the exploratory studies, but no test-case clouds were <br />classified as Class A-2 during the randomized seeding <br />experiment. Evidence from the HIPLEX-I physical <br />studies suggests that the stated criteria for Class A-2 <br />clouds were too narrow to separate out all of the cases <br />with active ice multiplication processes.) Clouds with <br />stronger updrafts or top temperatures between -12 <br />and - 200C at the time of selection were placed in the <br />third category, Class B. Class B clouds were considered <br />likely to precipitate naturally, with or without ice mul- <br />tiplication, due to their relatively cold tops. The dif- <br />ferences in behavior between seeded and nonseeded <br />clouds were expected to be most readily detected in <br />Class A-I clouds and hardest to detect in Class B clouds. <br />Class B clouds were selected for experimentation only <br />when no suitable Class A clouds were available. <br />The initial selection of candidate clouds was made <br />primarily on the basis of visual appearance from the <br />project aircraft. Aircraft passing through and over the <br />top of the candidate clouds (Fig. 2) then made the <br />various measurements suggested in Table 1. In this <br /> <br /> <br />,',r <br />.r. <br /> <br />FIG. 1. Photograph of HIPLEX-I Test Case 9 (22 July 1979) looking south from the seeding aircraft <br />at the -lOoC level -17 min after the treatment time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.