Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2. HIPLEX OVERVIEW <br /> <br />2.1 Introduction <br /> <br />The High Plains Region stretches from south central <br />Texas through the center of the Nation to eastern <br />Montana. It includes parts of New Mexico. <br />Oklahoma. Kansas. Nebraska. Colorado. Wyoming. <br />South Dakota. and North Dakota (fig. 2.1). The eco- <br />nomic base of the region is agricultural. but unlike <br />farming areas to the east which enjoy an average <br />annual rainfall of 750 to 1500 mm (30 to 60 in). <br />rainfall in the High Plains averages only 350 to <br />500 mm (14 to 20 in) per year. Even with the use of <br />good dry-farming methods. crop yields are incon- <br />sistent and often result in a "boom or bust" eco- <br />nomy. In a region where 2 or 3 of every 4 years are <br />parched. farming is indeed a gamble. <br /> <br />Irrigation water from reservoirs or pumped from <br />Plains aquifers has been used to stabilize the agricul- <br />turaleconomies and provide needed water supplies <br />to town and cities. Pumping. while useful and reason- <br />ably effective in the "short run." may actually create <br />more serious problems than it solves. It is a very <br />expensive undertaking. both in terms of the dollars <br />required to support the method as well as in terms <br />of the rapid consumption of ,a limited resource. In <br />many areas of the High Plains region. water levels in <br />the underground aquifers have dropped 30 m <br />(100 ft) or more since extensive pump irrigation <br />began over three decades ago. Natural recharge of <br />the aquifer is negligible. yet the demand for water <br />for agriculture. municipal. industrial. and recreational <br />use continues to grow (High Plains Associates. <br />1982). <br /> <br />. Thus the problem of water supply and demand <br />throughout the High Plains is twofold: a timely water <br />supply for crops is needed in an environment where <br />rainfall is. at best. uncertain. and depletion of the <br />existing underground water supplies. which is occur- <br />ring at an alarming rate. must be slowed or stopped. <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 2.1- The High Plains Region. Weather Modification may <br />provide a solution to water shortages in the High Plains. <br /> <br />Clearly. dependable alternate sources of water are <br />needed beyond that currently provided by rainfall or <br />pumped from the ground. <br /> <br />There are alternatives which may lead to a solution <br />(High Plains Associates. 1982). Among them. contin- <br />ually evolving methods of more effective water con- <br />servation. importation. reservoir storage. flood <br />control. and cloud seeding show promise. A combi- <br />nation of some or all of these methods will be needed <br />to increase the supply of surface wateir, reduce the <br />now heavy demand on aquifers. and eVlmtually result <br />in a stable water situation for the sl3miarid High <br />Plains. <br /> <br />2.2 Weather Modification and the Origin <br />of Hiplex <br /> <br />Among the possible solutions to High Plains water <br />shortages noted above. weather modification has <br />the advantages of being inexpensive while promising <br />immediate benefits. Therefore. there has been <br />interest in weather modification for rain stimulation <br />in the High Plains from the time modern cloud seed- <br />ing methods were introduced by commercial opera- <br />tors in the early 1950's. Numerous weather <br />modification projects have been conducted in the <br />High Plains. most of which have involved attempts <br />to increase rainfall by seeding convective clouds. <br />which are common in early summer and which con- <br />tribute much of the total annual precipitation. In <br />addition to these operational projects. an extensive <br />series of experimental projects was carried out by <br />the Bureau of Reclamation as part of "Project <br />Skywater." The results from these early Skywater <br />experiments were not considered conclusive enough <br />to justify the routine adoption of weatlher modifica- <br />tion technology by Federal agencies. Indications <br />were that economically important benefits might be <br />obtained. but the risk of failure or of undesirable side <br />effects had not been sufficiently quantified. <br /> <br />In 1973. the OMB (Office of Management and Bud- <br />get) directed the Bureau of Reclamation to launch a <br />program to reduce scientific uncerUlinties asso- <br />ciated with attempts to increase rainfall in the High <br />Plains through cloud seeding. The Bureau was <br />further directed "to maximize the scientific values of <br />this research" in an effort to permit more rational <br />decisions regarding the Government's role in the <br />application of weather modification technology. <br /> <br />The Bureau's response to the directive was HIPLEX, <br />which was developed and conducted in close coop- <br />eration with State and local Governments in the High <br />Plains Region. The efforts of these agencies were <br />joined from the outset by the Canadian Government. <br /> <br />Although launched as a specific program by the. <br />1973 OMB directive. HIPLEX constituled a contin- <br /> <br />5 <br />