Laserfiche WebLink
<br />cloud-top temperature, thickness, and the physical state and <br />size distribution of the particles constituting the cloud. <br />Shallow clouds with warm tops are thought to exert a net <br />cooling effect because they radiate considerable IR into <br />space, while clouds with cold tops warm the earth because <br />they are weak IR radiators. Calculations based on satellite <br />data of the annual global mean effect of all clouds have <br />shown that, on balance, clouds cool the earth. Estimates of <br />the net cooling effect have ranged from near zero to 40 W <br />m-2 (Fouquart et al. 1990), while recent results generally <br />fall between 17 and 27 W m'2 (Ramanathan et a!. 1989; <br />Arking 1991). <br /> <br />Because clouds exert a net cooling effect, it is likely <br />that any increase in cloudiness associated with a warmer <br />earth would exert a negative feedback effect, while a <br />decrease would exert a positive feedback effect. GCMs do <br />not agree on what the changes in cloud cover would be, so <br />they can not agree on the feedback effects. A comparison <br />of 19 different GCMs under perpetual July conditions <br />found about one-third of them exhibiting a negative <br />feedback effect and the other two-thirds a positive effect <br />(Cess et al. 1990; Arking 1991). In summary, there is <br />currently no way to tell whether the modification of the <br />earth's clouds by the enhanced greenhouse effect will lead <br />to a positive or a negative feedback effect upon surface <br />temperatures. <br /> <br />Multiple runs with the same GCMs have shown that <br />the results of doubled-C02 runs are also quite sensitive to <br />the albedos assigned to polar sea ice and seawater at low <br />sun angles (Meehl and Washington 1990). Varying these <br />assigned parameters within reasonable limits can lead to an <br />Arctic Ocean that becomes mostly ice-free in summer or to <br />one that stays icebound year round. The difference <br />produces noticeable effects on globally averaged <br />temperature and has serious implications for the climates of <br />northern North America and Eurasia. <br /> <br />6. EVIDENCE OF GLOBAL WARMING <br /> <br />The appreciable increases in CO2 that have occurred <br />already have prompted searches for a corresponding <br />warming of the earth's surface. The statistical problems <br />encountered in this approach parallel those involved in <br />detecting inadvertent weather modification and changes in <br />local weather produced by operational cloud seeding <br />programs. Obviously, the special methods developed to <br />evaluate randomized cloud seeding projects are not <br />applicable to the global warming issue. <br /> <br />Surface temperature data from different sources <br />have been combined and examined for evidence of global <br />warming. There are numerous problems with surface <br />temperature data, including station relocations, the <br />heat-island effect of cities, and changes in procedures for <br />measuring sea-surface temperature. Regional climate <br />variations over periods of a few decades further confuse the <br />issue. Still, there is good evidence that a net warming <br />averaging 0.5 DC over the earth's entire surface (both land <br />and sea) has occurred over the past century (Jones and <br />Wigley 1990). The evidence from thermometer readings is <br />reinforced by other types of evidence, including the <br />shrinking of glaciers and the warming of some Canadian <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />lakes (Houghton and Wood well 1989). The latest satellite <br />data indicate decreases in the extent of sea ice in the Arctic <br />regions during the period 1978 to 1987, but show no <br />significant trend in the extent of ice around Antarctica <br />(Gloersen and Campbell 1991). <br /> <br />As cloud seeders have learned, finding a trend in <br />meteorological data is just a starting point for discussions <br />of possible causes. As climate has been varying for <br />thousands of years, the observed warming during the <br />twentieth century is not necessarily due to increased <br />concentrations of greenhouse gases. Recently Balling <br />(1991) has pointed out that desertification, which afflicts 30 <br />percent of the land area of the globe to some degree, is <br />producing a significant warming trend in the affected areas. <br />Desertification may account for 0.05 DC or more of the <br />total warming of 0.5 DC observed over the past century. <br /> <br />Skeptics point to the fact that the global warming <br />was interrupted by a cooling trend in the Northern <br />Hemisphere from 1940 to about 1965, during which period <br />the CO2 concentration was going up at an accelerated pace. <br />Indeed, Gordon (1991) has shown that the observed <br />warming during the past century may be only a <br />manifestation of a random walk. Persons who believe that <br />global warming has begun consider the cooling from 1940 <br />to 1965 a temporary dip due to natural causes. The <br />existence of the dip is a reminder that global warming due <br />tb enhanced concentrations of greenhouse gases could be <br />masked at times by some combination of external driving <br />forces promoting a cooling of the earth. For example, dust <br />from the eruption of Mt. Pinatubo in the Phillipines in <br />1991 will exert a slight cooling effect on the earth's surface <br />over the next several years. Global warming could also be <br />masked by climate swings lasting a few decades and due <br />only to internal feedbacks in the ocean-atmosphere system <br />itself. Several experiments with GCMs have shown such <br />swings, as exemplified in two recent 100-year simulations <br />by Houghton et al. (1991). <br /> <br />Establishing that global warming is underway will <br />require, for conservative scientists, a demonstration that <br />changes have occurred that mimic, on a regional scale and <br />at different levels in the atmosphere, those predicted by <br />GCMs to accompany global warming. An announcement <br />from Goddard Space Flight Center in mid-1991 that the <br />temperature at 55 km altitude had dropped by 2.5 DC over <br />the previous 10 years is worthy of attention, because it <br />agrees with some GCM predictions of an enhanced <br />greenhouse effect. However, proof of global warming <br />according to the strict standard stated above is impossible <br />at this time, because the available GCMs do not agree in <br />their predictions of regional effects (Grotch and <br />MacCracken 1991). <br /> <br />7. NATURAL LIMITS ON GLOBAL WARMING <br /> <br />There are numerous conceivable feedback effects in <br />the ocean-atmosphere system, both positive and negative, <br />that have not been mentioned so far in this paper. For <br />example, warming of the ocean may release CH4 presently <br />locked up in sediments on continental shelves, thereby <br />exacerbating the buildup of greenhouse gases (Revelle <br />1983). On the other hand, several authors have suggested <br /> <br />113 <br /> <br />...l <br />