My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00434
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:12 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Generation of Secondary Ice Particles in Clouds by Crystal-Crystal Collision
Date
11/11/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2170 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES <br /> <br />then <br /> <br />where vg and v~ have been replaced by the observed <br />terminal velocities. <br />If the number of fragments generated can be de- . <br />termined as a function of the change in momentum, <br />then the total fragment generation rate can be found. <br />This "fragment generation function" has been found <br />for each of five different crystal types and will be <br />described in Section 3. Suffice it to say the fragment <br />generation functions take the form <br /> <br />Nijkl=a+(3log.:lMijkl+'Y(log.:lMijkl)2, (8) <br /> <br />where Nijkl is the number of fragments per collision <br />for crystal type i, size j hit by crystal type k, size l, <br />and a, (3, 'Yare constants determined for each of the <br />five crystal types studied. <br />It should again be reemphasized that Nijkl is an <br />approximation due to the prohibitive task of obtaining <br />a true N ijkl. <br /> <br />3) TOTAL FRAGMENT GENERATION <br /> <br />The fragment generation rate for collisions between <br />crystal type i, size j and crystal type k, size 1 is <br /> <br /> <br />(dC) = FijklNijkl, <br />dt ijkl <br /> <br />where C is the concentration of all crystals in a cloud, <br />t is time, (dC/dt)ijkl is the contribution to the total <br />fragment generation rate due to collisions between <br />crystal type i, size j and crystal type k, size l, Fijkl is <br />the collision frequency and Nijkl is the fragment gen- <br />eration function. <br />The total fragment generation rate for crystal- type <br />2, size j colliding with all other crystals in a cloud is <br /> <br />(dC) = L: L: FijkzNijkl. <br />dt ij k I <br /> <br />The total fragment generation rate for all crystal <br />types and sizes in a cloud is <br /> <br />dC <br />- = L: L: L: L: F ijklN ijkl. <br />dt i j k I <br /> <br />From Eq. (1), letting E= 1, dC/dt becomes <br /> <br />dC . . <br />-= L: L: L: L: C;jCkIAijkllvij-VkdNijkl. (12) <br />dt i j k I <br /> <br />Now if we define a distribution function for crystal <br />type and size, <br /> <br />C;j <br />.Pij=- <br />C <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />Ckl <br />Pkl=-, <br />C <br /> <br />VOLUME 35 <br /> <br />dC <br />-= L: L: L: L: CPijCPklAijkd Vij-Vkd Nijkl, (14) <br />dt i i k I <br /> <br />where C is a function of time. Since C is not an ex- <br />plicit function of crystal type or size, it may be <br />removed from the summations, i.e., <br /> <br />dC <br />_=C2 L: L: L: L: PijPkzAijkd Vij-Vkd Niikl. (15) <br />dt i i k I <br /> <br />"The terms in the summations are functions com- <br />pletely of crystal type and size distributions. These <br />may change in time but are independent of the con- <br />centration C. - <br /> <br />b. Analytic solutions <br />We define the function <br /> <br />K(t) = L: L: L: L: PiiPkzAijkd Vij-Vkd Niikl (16) <br />i i k I <br /> <br />and substitute it into Eq. (15) <br /> <br />(9) <br /> <br />dC <br />-=K(t)C2. <br />dt <br /> <br />(17) <br /> <br />In general K (t) changes with time because the dis- <br />tributions change as fragments are produced. The <br />production of fragments will cause the distributions <br />to have fewer crystals at large sizes and more crystals <br />at small sizes. The effect of this should be to cause <br />K (t) to decrease with time. <br />As a first approximation K (t) can be assumed to <br />be constant, i.e., <br /> <br />K(t) =Ko. <br /> <br />(18) <br /> <br />(10) <br /> <br />Integrating (17) with -the assumption in (18) gIves <br />the solution <br /> <br />Co <br /> <br />(19) <br /> <br />C <br /> <br />, <br />1-CoKot <br /> <br />where Co is the initial total concentration of crystals. <br />(11) This solution is plotted in Fig. 1. It has the following <br />characteristics: <br /> <br />1) If Ko is zero the concentration does not change <br />with time and there is no secondary particle generation. <br />2) If Ko is negative the concentration decreases <br />with time. However, from Eq. (16) we can see that <br />K 0 can never be less than zero. <br />3) If Ko is positive the concentration increases with <br />time. In fact, it increases at a rate greater than an <br />exponential increase because it approaches infinity at <br />some finite time. <br />4) The greater Ko and Co the faster the concen- <br />tration increases. <br /> <br />(13) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.