My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00434
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00434
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:12 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:01:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
The Generation of Secondary Ice Particles in Clouds by Crystal-Crystal Collision
Date
11/11/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />NOVEMBER 1978 <br /> <br />LARRY VARDIMAN <br /> <br />2179 <br /> <br />5. Results <br /> <br />The most critical pararl,Jeters in this study were <br />found to be the relative velocity between crystals <br />and the degree of rime. If the relative velocity for all <br />crystal sizes is increased by 10% the rate of fragment <br />generation increases by 50%. This is true because an <br />increase in relative velocity affects both the collision <br />frequency and the fragment generation function. The <br />effect on the fragment generation function is to in- <br />crease the change in momentum which produces a <br />nonlinear change in the number of fragments generated. <br />The crystal combination which has the greatest <br />relative velocity between crystals is graupel and un- <br />rimed plane dendrites. However, neither graupel nor <br />unrimed plane dendrites generate a large number of <br />fragments, so a greater effect was found between <br />graupel and rimed crystals. The greatest rate of <br />secondary particle generation was found between <br />heavily rimed plane dendrites and graupel although <br />ther,e was little difference from that between mod- <br />erately rimed plane dendrites and graupel or lightly <br />rimed spatial crystals and graupel. Apparently, the <br />reduction in relative velocity is more than compen- <br />sated for by the ability of rimed crystals to produce <br />fragments. <br />The magnitude of ice multiplication due to the <br />generation of secondary particles is less than a factor <br />of 10 for every possible combination of crystal types <br />and size distributions without accretion and diffusion. <br />The broader the distribution of either or both crystal <br />types colliding in a cloud, the greater the rate of <br />fragmentation. This is apparently an effect of shifting <br />a greater concentration of crystals to larger sizes by <br />a broader distribution. The larger the crystals, the <br />greater the relative velocities and the greater the <br />ability to produce fragments. Ice multiplication be- <br />comes less for smaller and narrower size distributions <br /> <br />E <br /> <br />c5- 0.10 <br />10 <br />, <br />~ <br />" <br />~ <br />z <br />Q <br />l- <br />e:( <br />a: <br />~ 0.05 <br />ILl <br />u <br />Z <br />o <br />u <br /> <br /> <br />and lighter rimed crystals. The generation of secondary <br />particles is effectively zero unless graupel or heavily <br />rimed particles are present. <br />When accretion and diffusion are allowed to occur <br />during fragmentation the concentration of crystals <br />continues to increase as a function of the rate of <br />accretion and diffusion and the ice multiplication can <br />become greater than a factor of 10. <br /> <br />6. Conclusions <br /> <br />The results of this study were somewhat different <br />than had been expected. The presen~ce of fragments <br />and numerous irregular crystals beneath convective <br />cells (Vardiman, 1972) led to the belief that me- <br />chanical. fracturing of unrimed dendrites would explain <br />part of the observed excess in ice crystal concentra- <br />tions. It was also thought that this process might <br />possibly be general enough to explain high crystal <br />concentrations observed in many other cloud con- <br />ditions. The findings from the model, based on ex- <br />perimentally derived fragment generation functions, <br />eliminate further consideration of unrimed crystals as <br />a source of more than minor numbers of in-cloud <br />fragments. The model does predict, however, that <br />under certain cloud conditions, significant fragmenta- <br />tion can occur, namely, when relatively large con- <br />centrations of rimed crystals are present. Since rela- <br />tively large concentrations of rimed crystals are <br />required before secondary particle generation can <br />proceed, this mechanism cannot explain the occurrence <br />of excess crystal concentrations at warm temperatures, <br />as observed by Mossop (1972). Even though mechani- <br />cal fracturing of rimed crystals by crystal-crystal col- <br />lision cannot explain ice multiplication in general, it <br />may still be important in certain cloud situations. <br />The following cloud types exemplify the possible <br /> <br />--- TIME = o minutes <br />........... TIME = 5minutes <br />-l.'ME = 10minutes <br /> <br />(0) <br /> <br />2 345 <br />DIAMETER (mm) <br /> <br />FIG. 9. Change in size distribution of graupel due to collision with <br />heavily rimed plane dendrites. <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />; ;~J",,,,",,,,:iw-. .~.~~ <br /> <br />~~,~J~L;~~i&ff;~~~&;~~~~~~~~~'r.t~,L~...,~.:!:~;~~vi~,,',;_,', <br /> <br /> <br />-.~~~~:;;fi~~~~~*"- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.