My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00433
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00433
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:11 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:01:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Generalized Criteria for Seeding Winter Orographic Clouds
Date
12/12/1978
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />1770 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 1:' <br /> <br />-- '.J <br />--. <br />8RIOGER ' <br /> <br />1,0___)-----\ : _ <br />-----,----1__, 1-' r-: u~ -- <br />: -r--- ' -- ---....-_ '. __ <br />"'" : 1..: ').. ~ <br />t L~~~/O I --fClcr.iA;' -i::----< : \ ok:' <br />CE1I84,,\ t-' t..~o i--- \~ \,- J .,}-:i-J <br />8411.,;,\ --. -- I ------L' ..--f..:--;r-'- <br />· 84R .. '. ~-, - . <br />84~ ;' JEMEZ:' ~ ~-----" <br />,? I L.. \ . -- \ \, <br />: .,-_.~--~ \ <br />.. L -.~-- <br /> <br />i <br />.-"1 <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />FIG. 1. Location of the seven projects used in generalized seedability criteria study. <br /> <br />graphical extremes be covered, that randomization of <br />seeded events was used, and that sufficient quality <br />data be readily available to permit a reasonable likeli- <br />hood that statistical significance could be reached <br />through testing. <br />The quality and quantity of data varied considerably <br />from project to project. Rather than narrow the set <br />of cases to include only those few projects or portions <br />of projects with the most complete physical measure- <br />ments, it was decided to base the study on precipitation <br />gage data and rawinsonde information. Since this in- <br />formation was available for all the projects the range <br />of geographic settings (see Fig. 1) and meteorological <br />conditions covered by the analysis was increased. The <br />other data that were available from the projects were <br /> <br />TABLE 1. A brief description of the seven 'projects used in this <br />study_ Listed are the major mountain barrier within the projects' <br />experimental area, the state where the project was located and the <br />inclusive dates of winter seasons during which seeding occurred. <br /> <br />Project Size Seeding operations <br />Bridger Range Project Rocky Mountains- 1969-70 to 1971-72 <br /> Montana (3 seasons) <br />Climax Project Rocky Mountains- 1960-61 to 1969-70 <br /> Colorado (10 seasons) <br />Colorado River Basin <br />Pilot Project Rocky Mountains- 1970-71 to 1974-75 <br /> Colorado (5 seasons) <br />Central Sierra Research <br />Experiment Sierra Nevada- 1968-69 to 1972-73 <br /> California (5 seasons) <br />".r emez Mountains Project Rocky Mountains- 1968-69 to 1971-72 <br /> New Mexico (4 seasolls) <br />Pyramid Lake Pilot <br />Project Sierra N evada- 1972-73 to 1974-75 <br /> California/Nevada (3 seasons) <br />Santa Barbara Project South Coastal 1967-68 to 1973,-74 <br /> Range-California (7 seasons) <br /> <br />used to provide insight into the interpretation of results <br />derived from the statistical analysis. <br />Seven projects were chosen for this analysis: the <br />Bridger Range Experiment in Montana (Bridger), the <br />Climax Experiments in Colorado (Climax), the Colorado <br />River Basin Pilot Project in Colorado (CRBPP-San <br />Juan), the Central Sierra Research Experiment in <br />c:::alifornia (CENSARE), the Jemez Project in New <br />Mexico (Jemez), the Pyramid Lake Pilot Project in <br />Nevada (Pyramid Lake), and the Santa Barbara II <br />Project in California (Santa Barbara). Table 1 lists the <br />projects, their sites and their period of seeding opera- <br />tions. Each, of the projects had different topography, <br />climatology, opportunity recognition criteria, treat- <br />ment procedures and evaluation techniques. <br />The basic information used in this study was the <br />rawinsonde data at 6 h intervals during experimental <br />events, 6 h precipitation totals summed from 2 h before <br />the sounding to 4 h after the sounding, descriptions of <br />the individual mountain barriers and seeding networks, <br />and tabulations indicating when the seeding generators <br />were on and off. If at least one generator was on during <br />the period 1 h before the start of a 6 h block to 1 h before <br />the end of the block, the period was considered seeded. <br />Carryover contamination was not considered. <br />An important part of this study was to identify where <br />the effects of seeding occurred as well as the magnitude <br />of the effect. Therefore, the precipitation gages were <br />grouped in similar regions in relation to the mountain <br />barrier. The crest group included those gages in the in-. <br />tended primary target area of the individual projects" <br />generally those along and on either side of the ridge <br />crest. Other groups of gages were considered as upwind. <br />or downwind of the crest group of gages. <br /> <br />'1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.