Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences <br />A. The General Environment <br /> <br />Grand t-1esa is a "table top" mountain with slightly undulating surface <br />at elevations above 10,000 feet, reaching peak elevations above <br />11,000 feet. Over 200 small lakes and reservoirs are on the mesa in <br />a hummocky terrain that is the result of glaciation, mud flows, and <br />slumping. The elevation drops rapidly from the mesa top to an eleva- <br />tion of about 7400 feet in only 4 miles. Mass wasting in the form of <br />landslides and slumps has been a major factor in forming benched and <br />hummocky topography surrounding the mesa proper. <br /> <br />". <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Streams from the many lakes have cut an intricate drainage pattern, <br />producing terraces and alluvial or outwash fans (locally called <br />mesas) which vary in size from a few acres to several square miles. <br />These mesas and the river valleys provide farm land. Below 7200 <br />feet, agricultural patterns dominate the landscape. Orchards, small <br />grains, and pastureland are intermixed. The Colorado and Gunnison <br />River floodplains are at about 5000 feet. <br /> <br />Agriculture and recreation/tourism activities are the economic base <br />of this region. Good quality bituminous coal is mined commercially <br />in small quantities. <br /> <br />The Colorado River Augmentation Demonstration Program would take <br />place in and affect that area on Grand Mesa above 9000 feet. The <br />area is principally in the Grand Mesa National Forest, with a minor <br />amount of private land included. Major uses of the National Forest <br />are watershed protection, wildlife range, timber production, <br />livestock grazing, and recreation. The private land is used mostly <br />for commercial establishments and cabin sites. None of the area is <br />under consideration as a wilderness area. <br /> <br />B. Consequences from Alternatives Other Than the Proposed Action <br /> <br />The No Action Alternative would mean no manipulation of the environ- <br />ment and would, therefore, have no immediate effects. In the long <br />term, the anticipated water shortages (see Section I) would have <br />severe and wide-ranging impacts if not alleviated, which could be <br />affected by the loss of timely research on weather modification. <br /> <br />Use of a different geographic area for the site of the proposed <br />research would affect the research rather than a have a significant <br />environmental effect. Other areas offer less in the way of potential <br />storms for the type of studies proposed, nifficult ann more limited <br />winter access, and more rugged topography which would limit the data <br />that could be obtained by aircraft compared to that possible at Grand <br />Mesa. The general environment niscussed in Section III.C. (following) <br />would be essentially the same for any other alpine watershed in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin, ann the potential for impacts the same <br />since the same limited research program would be instituted in any <br />other area. <br /> <br />$ <br /> <br />16 <br />