Laserfiche WebLink
<br />2 <br /> <br />These conclusions contradict the view of some proponents of <br />weather modification, that since Western civilization has been based <br />on exploitation of resources and modification of the environment, any <br />change is acceptable if present economic benefit can be obtained <br />from it. These individuals point out that a technological fix has <br />always been possible up to now whenever ecological trouble threatened. <br /> <br />Also rejected here is the viewpoint of some ecologists, whom social <br />scientists (e. g., Wengert 1958) have accused of contending that <br />sound resource use should be measured against the primeval conditions <br />of 1492. "... In this view man is the despoiler of nature, and <br />resources and their preservation become ends in themselves. To the social <br />scientists, resources are a means -- a function of time, space, and cul- <br />ture . . . [The objective should be] the application of intelligence <br />to current resource problems in the context of particular social conditions <br />and objectives. II The mere assertion' that the environment is being <br />changed or even damaged does not of itself justify social intervention <br />to prevent or reverse the change. There is needed first an assessment of <br />the magnitude of the damage, and of its political, economic, and other <br />social costs; and then an exploration of alternative measures and'devices <br />for achieving similar ends (Barnett 1967)~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />GENERAL CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />Ecological effects of weather modification will be the result of, <br />moderate shifts in rates of reproduction, growth, and mortality of weather-- <br />. sensitive species of plants and animals. Ecological changes from the kinds <br />of weather modification now visualized will seldom be sudden or catastro- <br />phic.' Plant and animal communities change rather slowly in response to <br />changed climate. The cumulative effect of slow year-to-year changes in <br />species abundance could be a rather extensive alteration of original con- <br />dition, but the alteration could take place almost unnoticed by the general <br />public. <br /> <br />The combined effect of such stresses as air pollution, pesticide <br />application, and other environmental changes may interact with weather <br />modification in such a way that the total effect will be substantially <br />greater than the sum of the individual, perhaps relatively small, alter- <br />ations (109).ll The prospect of complex ecological interactions is one <br />of the most important points to be considered in assessing the probable <br />consequences of environmental change due to the activities of man. <br /> <br />Weather modification will be a change imposed on an already variable <br />climate. This will make quick detection of its effects more difficult <br />than if normal weather was identical from one year to the next. This <br />problem will be accentuated by the normai, so far unexplained, fluctua- <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />l/Numbers in parentheses refer to the pertinent pages in the body of this <br />report. <br />