My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00431
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00431
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:10 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:00:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Ecological Effects of Weather Modification: A Problem Analysis
Date
5/1/1969
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
165
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />7 <br /> <br />justifiably be financed from weather modification funds, but it shcluld <br />specifically be designed to include other aspects of environmental change <br />as well as weather modification. The analysis should include, among <br />other things: <br /> <br />Purpose of ecological survey and monitoring program <br />What is to be measured <br />Who will use the resulting data, and in what way <br />Relation to existing programs of state and federal agencies <br />(Examples: USGS Vigil Network; USFS Barometer Watershed <br />program; ESSA Benchmark stations) <br />Procedure <br />Standardization of measurement <br />Frequency of remeasurement <br />Statistical design and interpretation <br />Who should do it <br />Agency responsible -- existing federal agency, or new inde- <br />pendent group such as a National Ecology In~titute <br />Requirements for technical manpower -- use of technicians! <br />versus highly trained specialists <br />Lessons from similar programs in other countries.. <br />Particularly Australian Division of Land. Research and Regional <br />Survey, C.S.I.R.O. (Primarily a regional development survey, <br />not an environmental monitoring program) <br />Cost estimates, and cost-benefit relations. <br />Application of results <br /> <br />Field research, on a relatively limited basis at first, should <br />be initiated to develop effective operational procedures for measuring <br />relevant indicators of biological change on actual sample plots (10.3). <br /> <br />Pre-modification Survey <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. Approximately 10% of the budget for any large-scale pilot project <br />in weather modification, .such as is now planned for the Upper, Colorado <br />River Basin, should be allocated to a concurrent biological survey of <br />the affected area, to identify and evaluate conditions likely. to b,e <br />significantly altered by a deliberate change in climate. Such a survey <br />should be. undertaken for exactly the same reason that the meteoro11:lgical <br />program is being carried out -- to develop and test procedures and <br />techniques for use in an eventual operational program. If the pro:spects <br />of deliberate weather modification are good enough to justify field <br />operations on the scale of the proposed Colorado River Basin Pilot <br />Project, they are good enough to demand expenditures to develop procedures <br />for identifying in advance some of the possible social and biological <br />cOnsequences of this new technology (144). <br /> <br />.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.