My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00430
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00430
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:39:07 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 10:00:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Diagnostic Technique for Targeting During Airborne Seeding Experiments in Wintertime Storms over the Sierra Nevada
Date
7/7/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />820 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 27 <br /> <br />falling seeding material curtain and was the altitude <br />typically flown by the research aircraft. Referring to <br />Fig. 6, a first estimate of the particle trajectory (line <br />AB) was calculated. The error in this trajectory was <br />calculated by determining the direction and distance <br />between the impact point and the target (vector BD). <br />The first estimate of the SLCP (point C) was determined <br />by moving from the origin the direction and length of <br />BD. This procedure was repeated again using point C <br />as the new starting point. More than one iteration was <br />required because the particle moved through a different <br />region of the wind field in each iteration. The procedure <br />continued iteratively until the solution coverged on the <br />SLCP. Normally, convergence to within I km of the <br />target occurred after three iterations. Once the SLCP <br />was calculated, the seedline orientation and length were <br />determined. The seedline was oriented perpendicular <br />to the line connecting the SLCP and the target. For <br />research purposes in SCPP, the length of the seedline <br />was varied with distance from the target (see Table 2). <br />To maximize seeding effects over a small target area <br />at the ground, it was desirable to seed as much of the <br />volume of air as possible by making the seedlines <br />shorter and closer together. However, errors in the cal- <br />culated wind direction have a greater potential to cause <br />particles created by seeding to miss the target when the <br />seedlines are short. The length of the seedlines were <br />calculated by assuming a :t200 error in the calculated <br />wind direction. As the trajectories of particles became <br />longer due to higher wind speeds, the length of the <br />seedlines were increased proportionally. The values <br />appearing in Table 2 were chosen to satisfy the 200 <br />error criterion and operational requirements of the air- <br />craft. Once the SLCP and seedline were known, a final <br />trajectory was calculated for a crystal originating at the <br />SLCP. The predicted crystal habit, rime characteristics, <br />fall velocity evolution and total fall time were recorded <br />for later analysis. <br />The areal coverage of the seeding effect at the ground <br />is a function of the depth the seeding material falls in <br />the atmosphere, the vertical wind shear within that <br />depth, the variations in fall velocity that develop as <br />crystals originating near the same location encounter <br />differences in saturation and liquid water content along <br />their trajectories, and, in the case of AgI, variation in <br />the activation time of individual AgI aerosol (see Rhea <br />and Elliott, 1986). For CO2 and pyrotechnic seeding, <br />all effects except AgI activation were considered. <br /> <br />TABLE 2. Seedline length versus trajectory length (T). <br />SCPP fixed target experiments. <br /> <br />Trajectory length (T) <br />(km) <br /> <br />Seeding line length <br />[km (nmi)] <br /> <br />T< 10 <br />30>T;;,,1O <br />45 > T;;" 30 <br />T;;" 45 <br /> <br />10 (5) <br />19 (10) <br />28 (15) <br />37 (20) <br /> <br />Stewart and Marwitz (1982a) discuss in detail the <br />mechanism of spreading of an initially vertical column <br />of ice crystals due to vertical shear and variation in <br />particle fallspeed. Unfortunately, the variations in par- <br />ticle fall velocity that occur in a sample of ice particles <br />due to variations in particle growth rates have not been <br />determined quantitatively. Variations in particle ve- <br />locity were parameterized by allowing five particles to <br />fall from each level. The fall velocity of each of these <br />particles was given by <br /> <br />Vtn = O.I(n + 6)Vt, n = 1,2,3,4,5 (7) <br /> <br />where Vtn is the fall velocity of particle n and V; is the <br />standard terminal velocity calculated from the equa- <br />tions in Table 1. <br />The depth of the seeding curtain varied with the type <br />of flare used or the mean diameter of the CO2 pellets. <br />In SCPP, extensive tests were conducted prior to each <br />field experiment to determine the depth that flares fell <br />while burning and CO2 pellets fell before sublimating. <br />The flares (TBI-20 g flares)l consistently fell about 1000 <br />m. The size of CO2 pellets varied from year to year <br />depending on the dispensing system. The correspond- <br />ing fall distances varied from 600-1000 m. Fig. 7 shows <br />the predicted SLCP, seedline and fallout area of crystals <br />for an aircraft flare release at 4000 m into a cloud with <br />average LWC = 0.10 g m-3 at 1800 UTC 5 February <br />1986. <br /> <br />3) PROCEDURES FOR AIRBORNE ACETONE GENER- <br />A TORS <br /> <br />The targeting calculations for experiments which <br />utilized airborne acetone generators were nearly iden- <br />tical to those for flare or CO2 releases, but the methods <br />to calculate the SLCP and fallout area differed. The <br />primary difference between the two seeding techniques <br />was that the flares and CO2 produced a deep vertical <br />curtain while airborne generators produced narrow <br />continuous plumes. The target crystal for airborne <br />generator releases was initiated at the altitude of the <br />seeder aircraft. The method to determine the spread <br />of the seeding effect took into account the variation in <br />activation time of individual aerosols. <br />Various chemical solutions have been developed for <br />use in airborne aerosol generators. The solution used <br />in SCPP generators, a 3% AGINH4I acetone mixture <br />with 30 mole% NH4Cl04, has been studied extensively <br />in the isothermal cloud chamber at the Colorado State <br />University Aerosol and Cloud Simulation Laboratory <br />(DeMott et al. 1983). DeMott et al. found this com- <br />pound to have a high yield at warm (-60 to -lOoC) <br />temperatures and function primarily by contact nu- <br />cleation. They observed 50% of all nucleation events <br />within 5 min after introduction of the nuclei into the <br />chamber and 90% within 20 min. <br />DeMott et al. data concerning the nucleation rate <br /> <br /> <br />1 The flares were manufactured by Nuclei Engineering Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.