Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pyramid Lake Pilot Project <br /> <br />The Desert Research Institute (DR!) ran the Pyramid Lake Pilot <br />Project as a part of Project Skywater from 1972 to 1975. 13/ It was <br />concluded in the DRI report that "The measurement of precTj)'itation <br />in the form of snow by means of typical recording gages is inaccurate <br />* * *" It was also concluded that even if precipitation could be <br />measured with sufficient accuracy at a number of gage sites in <br />mountainous terrain, serious problems are involved in deriving an <br />estimate of the total volume of precipitation over a !Jiven area for <br />a given period. The method of interpolating between observations is <br />the simplest procedure but is not reliable in mountainous terrain. <br />Therefore, DRI tested an X-band radar on ~quaw Peak, California, <br />for estimating areal precipitation. The radar was remote controlled <br />and operated at about 2700 meters (8900 feet) elevation. Although <br />conclusive evidence was not developed during the program, case <br />studies did show that the radar data indicate similar levels of <br />precipitation as reported from ground measurements, and there <br />appears to be potential for further development. <br /> <br />,- <br /> <br />High Plains Cooperative Program <br /> <br />Technology development has continued in Project Skywater through work <br />on the High Plains Cooperative Program (HIPLEX), a research program <br />with field sites in Montana, Kansas, and Texas. The program incor- <br />porates a full range of instrumentation for measuring precipitation <br />from a dense network of "fence post" gages to satellite. <br /> <br />In order to compensate for the sparsity of rain gages, remotely <br />sensed measu rements are bei ng made for the HI PLEX IVlil E~S City, <br />Montana site. In making a gage to radar intercomparison, the ideal <br />situation is to compare the data from the most representative sector <br />observed by the radar with the gage data, taking into consideration <br />the horizontal movement of precipitation particles and time correc- <br />tions to account for the time interval oetween radar detection and <br />gage detecti on. A compari son' between data collected l)y the Skywater <br />5-cm raoar dnd 18 precipitation gages at Miles City iMicated that <br />under some storm conditions radar can provide estimates of precipita- <br />tion. 14/ However, with small echoes, over a large area with short <br />lifetimes and with intentional modification of the nOl"mal drop-size <br />distribuClor, the difficulty of using radar increases for detecting <br />small changes. <br /> <br />'U <br /> <br />Another remo~e measuring device is the SMS/GOES satellite which is <br />capable of mbnitoring clouds and ClOUd systems and is now being <br />tested for making remute rainfall measurements. 15/ The most promising <br />technique is the Scofield-Oliver method which momtors the decrease <br /> <br />6 <br />