Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />6.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS <br /> <br />The purpose of the analyses conducted by CIC has been to <br />describe and identify the meteorological and physical processes <br />active during the individual seeding events. The data reduction <br />was accomplished without knowledge of seed versus control Ie vents <br />and the interpretation has been accomplished without knowledge of <br />the rainfall patterns. The University of Delaware, under a <br />separate report, will provide the analysis of the rainfall patterns. <br /> <br />6.1 Operational Period Results <br />In this report we have made only a cursory rE!view <br />of the 16 Operational Missions. Thus the discussions are only <br />meant to be subjective and give a general impression of results. <br />The execution of the seeding missions went well. There were a <br />few times where ATC problems created delays in the seeding but <br />overall coverage and deli very was good. <br />Echo time histories for the operational missions <br />show similar response sequences as those described in more <br />detail in Section 5. It is clear that some seeding opportunities <br />exist outside the Experimental Period and, when rainfall is needed, <br />these opportunities should be exploited. <br /> <br />6.2 Experimental Period Results <br />Ten case studies have been used to determine the <br />cloud processes typically occurring during those days declared <br />suitable for dynamic seeding. Four of these cases were in fact <br />seeded with placebos (sand nares) and serve as examples of <br />natural cloud conditions <br />Two of the control cases were very similar (Cases <br />IT and IV). They occurred with unstable air following the passage <br /> <br />115 <br />