Laserfiche WebLink
<br />morning; 11. low temperatures and snow depth force the congre- <br />gation of animals which increases their susceptibility to <br />predation; 12. food availability eliminates many of the weaker <br />animals; 13. migrational movements from one range to another are <br />influenced by time and/or weather; 14. spring storms can reduce <br />the condition of animals and/or reduce the number of individuals <br />in a population; 15. food habits of some species change with the <br />amount of precipitation which can be beneficial or detrimental; <br />and 16. use of south faci ng slopes for food and north faci ng <br />slopes for protection.1I [16,p. 8J <br /> <br />Studies of the response of small mammals to winter snow accumulation <br />in the San Juan Mountains [10J do not reveal clearly predictable <br />responses. Lower population numbers seem to occur after winters with <br />late snowpack and late melt. The proximate cause seems to be spring-. <br />time shortage of proper food and a shortened breeding season. Other <br />factors, such as changes in land use, appear to have a more direct <br />effect on small mammal populations. The Skywater Programmatic FES <br />states: <br /> <br />liOn the basis of the above findings, it is expected that the <br />Skywater programs of field experimentation will have no dis- <br />cernible impact on small-mammal populations. The potential <br />impact of widespread or prolonged application of precipita- <br />tion management will probably involve occasional episodes or <br />circumstances resulting in temporary declines in small-mammal <br />populations. Because of the large population fluctuations that <br />normally occur, decl i nes caused by these infrequent epi sodes <br />will be difficult to identify or attribute to specific causes. <br />There appears to be little likelihood that such applications <br />will significantly affect the range of diversity of small-mammal <br />species.1I [2, p. 3-131J <br /> <br />The effect of additional precipitation on furbearers, reptiles, <br />insects, and birds has not been considered a controlling factor to <br />the well-being of the various species. Migratory birds would not be <br />affected by winter snowpack increase unless highly augmented snow- <br />packs persi sted so as to interfere with breedi ng seasons or food <br />supply - an unlikely occurrence. Residents are well adapted to <br />conditions of an area, and vary their location/elevation in alpine <br />settings according to weather conditions. Habitat destruction or <br />alteration is the most serious factor in the well-being of bird <br />populations. Cloud seeding will not contribute to this occurrence. <br />Increased snowme lt wi 11 benefit marshes and meadows and the an ima 1 s <br />that inhabit them. <br /> <br />One of the design considerations for the proposed demonstration phase <br />and for operational activities is to determine the type of monitoring <br />required to determine the response of large and small mammals and <br />their well-being to increases in snowfall and snowpack. <br /> <br />Knowledge of the potential impact of precipitation management on the <br />principal components of the aquatic ecosystems is limited. An <br /> <br />18 <br />