Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1602 <br /> <br />MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW <br /> <br />VOLUME 112 <br /> <br />Convective Rain Rates and their Evolution during Storms in a Semiarid Climate <br /> <br />ANDREA DONEAUD, STEFANO IONESCu-NISCOyI AND JAMES R. MILLER, JR. <br />Institute of Atmospheric Sciences, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701-3995 <br />(Manuscript received 5 July 1983, in final form 10 May 1984) <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Rain rates and their evolution during summertime convective storms were analyzed for the semiarid <br />climate of the northern High Plains. Radar data from a total of 750 radar echo clusters from the 1980 and <br />1981 summer cloud seeding operations of the North Dakota Cloud Modification Project (NDCMP) were <br />used. The analysis suggests that the average rain rate R among storms is, in a first approximation, independent <br />of the total rain volume if the entire storm duration is considered in the averaging process. This average rain <br />rate depends primarily on the reflectivity threshold considered in calculating the area coverage integrated <br />over~the lifetime of the storm, the area-time integral (ATI). For the 25 dBz reflectivity threshold used in the <br />, ATI computations, R was 4.0 mm h-I with a standard deviation of 1.55 mm h-', being -20% higher for <br />wet season conditions. <br />The evolution of rain rates during storms was analyzed by dividing each storm lifetime into 10 min, I, 2 <br />and 4 h, and growing and decaying periods. A 10 min time increment was used in computing the parameters <br />for all time intervals. A storm cluster reached its maximum growth after an average of 56% of its lifetime. <br />The average rain rate for the growing period exceeded that for the decaying period by about 10%. As the <br />time interval used in computations approached the storm lifetime, the scatter of the average rain rates was <br />reduced, thus increasing the accuracy of rainfall estimates using the area time integral. The value of R <br />remained independent of the total rain volume when the growing or decaying periods of storms were <br />considered separately. The total rain volume was also well correlated with the maximum single-scan rain' <br />volume. These findings suggest the possibility of estimating total storm rain volume at its maximum stage of <br />development. <br />It is hoped that improvements in rainfall estimation over areas using satellite data may result from further <br />studies, since the precipitating part of a cloud picture can be more accurately defined for the growing period <br />of a cloud's history. <br /> <br />1. Introduction <br /> <br />It is generally recognized that the average rain rate <br />considered over short periods of time (i.e., minutes) <br />exhibits large variations during convective storms. <br />However, if computed over longer time intervals or <br />particularly ever the--lifetime ofa storm, the average <br />rain rate shows much less variability. A recently <br />developed technique for estimating rainfall amounts <br />on the basis of tjme-resolved area coverage informa- <br />tion (Doneaud et al., 1981; Liu, 1982; Ionescu- <br />Niscov, 1982) implied a slight increase in the average <br />rain rate (computed over the lifetime of a storm) <br />when the area coverage was integrated over the rain <br />duration. The key element of that technique was the <br />very high linear correlation found between rainfall <br />area integrated over the rain duration, called the <br />area-time integral (A TI), and the radar estimated <br />rain volume (RERV). The ratio of the RERV (km2 <br />mm) to this A TI (km2 h) gives the average rain rate <br />R (mni h-1). The slope of the linear fit was found to <br /> <br />1 Present affiliation: Atmospheric Science Center, Desert Research <br />Institute, P.O. Box 60220, Reno, NY. <br /> <br />@ 1984 American Meteorological Society <br /> <br />be a little higher than 1. The close relationship <br />between the rain volume and the A TI producing it <br />indicates that the reflectivity factors and the associated <br />rainfall rates likely follow some well defined statistical <br />distribution for a given locale and the degree of <br />_ orga~jzati~n of a convective syst~!D. (Stout and <br />Mueller, 1968). Lopez et al. (1983) studied similar <br />relationships between the areal.extent of precipita~on <br />and the corresponding rain volumes in south Florida-- <br />using FACE II data. They found correlation coeffi- <br />cients as high as 0.92 and 0.90 for radar-estimated <br />and gage-derived rain volumes, respectively. <br />Byers (1948) was apparently the first to find a slight <br />variability in storm duration average rain rate, and <br />emphasized the close relationship between the amount <br />of rain falling from a shower and its size and duration. <br />The echo area-rain volume relation was extensively <br />employed as a tool for estimating rain volumes from <br />satellite data. Stoutet al. (1979) described similarities <br />in rain 'fate evolution during tropical storms using <br />GATE satellite and radar data. They also stated that <br />rain rate varied depending upon storm type. Griffith <br />et al. (1976, 1978) developed a technique for rain <br />volume estimation over areas. The original Griffith- <br />