My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13055
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 9:02:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.200
Description
Energy
State
CO
Date
2/1/1982
Author
Musick and Cope
Title
Briefing Paper on Critical Water Supply Variables for Energy Development in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />2. Colorado Department of Natural Resources (DNR) <br /> <br />It is estimated that the water demands of a <br />[synfuels] industry of about 1.5 million <br />bbl/day, as well as the water demands of the <br />associated growth, could be satisfied from <br />surface supplies without having to signifi- <br />cantly reduce (if at all) other projected con- <br />sumptive uses in the Upper Basin. This --- <br />conclusion is premised on four major quali- <br />fiers. <br /> <br />First, surface water supplies can be made <br />available for the development of [synfuels] <br />only if: <br /> <br />1. water not presently under contract <br />is purchased from existing u.s. Bureau of <br />Reclamation reservoirs; and/or <br /> <br />2. new reservior, pipeline, and pumping <br />facilities are constructed in order to <br />capture, store, and transport the water. <br /> <br />* * * <br /> <br />Second, it must be recognized that the above <br />conclusion only takes into account the projec- <br />tions of consumptive uses. The increased <br />depletions and hydrologic regulation attribu- <br />table to [synfuels development] could reduce <br />the supply of instream recreational oppor- <br />tunities and the habitat available for various <br />fish species from what they might otherwise <br />be. <br /> <br />* * * <br /> <br />Third, this conclusion takes into account only <br />those institutional factors that are embodied <br />in each State's water rights system and in the <br />'Law of the River' (i.e., an international <br />treaty, interstate compacts, u.S. Supreme <br />Court decrees, and acts of Congress governing <br />the oper~tion of Colorado River reservoirs). <br />While not part of the traditional body of laws <br />governing the use and allocation of water in <br />and among the Upper Basin states, numerous <br />other institutional factors, primarily Federal <br />environmental regulatory laws and programs, <br />may affect the timing, manner, and location of <br />water resource developments in the Upper <br />Basin. <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />- <br />.~{:'.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.