Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />TABLE 6: NOTES <br /> <br />, ~ <br /> <br />':','v.:: <br /> <br />1. Table 3, Part A, Column 1, supra. <br />2. See Figure 2. <br />3. "13(a) Assessment," Table 3.1. See Appendix 1. <br />4. Ibid; Table 4.2 (Medium Scenario) and Table 5.3 (Baseline Case). See Appendix 1. <br />5. Existing plus projected depletions on each tributary divided by the statewide total (.541 <br />MAF lyre ) <br /> <br />6. Statewide compact entitlement (.728 MAF/yr.) - existing plus projected depletions (.541 <br />MAF/yr.) = .187 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />7. 1975 mainstem reservoir evaporation (.607/yr.) X 90% (for reservoir drawdowns) X 14% <br />(Wyoming's percentage entitlement under 1948 Compact) = .076 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />8. Existing plus projected depletions (.541 MAF/yr.) + remaining compact share (.187 MAF/yr.) <br />mainstem evaporation charge (.076 MAF/yr) = .652 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />I <br />M <br />M <br />I <br /> <br />9. Virgin flow leaving Wyoming. Bureau of Reclamation estimates reduced by 10% to reflect <br />more realistic flow conditions. <br /> <br />. . <br />