Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 5: NOTES <br /> <br />. ' <br />:,~: <br /> <br />1. Table 3, Part A, Column 1, supra. <br />2. See Figure 2. <br />3. "13(a) Assessment," Table 3.1. See Appendix 1. <br />4. Ibid: Table 4.2 (Medium Scenario) and Table 5.3 (Baseline Case). See Appendix 1. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Existing plus projected depletions on each tributary divided by the statewide total (1.092 MAF/yr). <br /> <br />Statewide compact entitlement (1.196 MAF/yr) - existing plus projected depletions (1.092 MAF/yr) = .104 <br />MAF/yr. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />7. <br /> <br />1975 mainstem reservoir evaporation (.607 MAF/yr) x 90% (for reservoir drawdowns) x 23% (Utah's percen- <br />tage entitlement under 1948 Compact) = .126 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />B. <br /> <br />I <br />r-4 <br />Existing plus projected depletions (1.092 MAF/yr) + remaining compact share (.104 MAF/yr) - mainstem M <br />evaporation charge (.126 MAF/yr) = 1.070 MAF/yr. I <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Virgin flow entering Utah from Wyoming, Colorado and New Mexico, except for the Duschesne (virgin flows <br />at mouth). See figure 2. Bureau of Reclamation estimates reduced by 10% to reflect more realistic <br />flow conditions. Virgin flow for San Juan based on Bureau estimate at Bluff, Utah. This estimate has <br />been adjusted to reflect percentage of San Juan drainage in Colorado above this estimation point. <br />