Laserfiche WebLink
<br />TABLE 4: NOTES <br /> <br />. ' <br />:,~' <br /> <br />l. Table 3, Part A, Column 1, supra. <br /> <br />!. See Figure 2. <br /> <br />I. "13(a) Assessment,. Table 3.1. See Appendix 1. <br /> <br />. Ibid., Table 4.2 (Medium Scenario) and Table 5.3 (Baseline Case). See Appendix 1. <br />Existing plus projected depletions on each tributary divided by the statewide total (2.454 MAF/yr). <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />I . <br /> <br />Statewide compact entitlement (2.691 MAF/yr) - existing plus projected depletions (2.454 MAF/yr) = <br />.237 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />1975 mainstem reservoir evaporation (.607 MAFyr) x 90% (for reservoir drawdowns) x 51.75% <br />(Colorado's percentage entitlement under 1948 Compact) = .283 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />:~ Existing Existing plus projected depletions (2.454 MAF/yr) + remaining compact share (.237 MAF/yr) <br />mainstem evaporation charge (.283 MAF/yr) = 2.408 MAF/yr. <br /> <br />I <br />en <br />N <br />I <br /> <br />Virgin flows leaving Colorado, except for the Gunnison (virgin flow at mouth). See Figure 2. <br />Bureau of Reclamation estimates reduced by 10% to reflect more realistic flow conditions. Virgin <br />flow for San Juan based on Bureau estimate at Bluff, Utah. This estimate has been adjusted to <br />reflect percentage of San Juan drainage in Colorado above this estimation point. <br />