My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP13055
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
DayForward
>
1001-2000
>
WSP13055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 1:54:18 PM
Creation date
4/18/2008 9:02:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.200
Description
Energy
State
CO
Date
2/1/1982
Author
Musick and Cope
Title
Briefing Paper on Critical Water Supply Variables for Energy Development in the Upper Colorado River Basin
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3. Curtailment of the Lower Basin Under the 1968 <br />Colorado River Basin Project Act.................... <br /> <br /> a. <br /> b. <br /> c. <br /> d. <br /> e. <br />4. 1948 <br /> a. <br /> b. <br /> c. <br /> d. <br /> <br />Congressional Recognition of Basin-wide <br /> <br />Deficiencies................................... <br /> <br />A Tenuous Gamble............................... <br /> <br />Failure to Curtail the Lower Basin............. <br /> <br />The Need for Basin-wide Water Management....... <br /> <br />Assumptions Made by Recent Studies............. <br /> <br />Upper Colorado River Compact................... <br /> <br />Percentage Apportionment of Consumptive Use.... <br /> <br />Benchmarks for Upper Basin Tributary <br />Apportionments: A Middle Scenario.............. <br /> <br />Benchmarks for Tributary Apportionments: <br />Four Scenarios................................. <br /> <br />Alternative Methods for Tributary <br /> <br />Apportionments................................. <br /> <br />e. Assumptions Made by Recent Studies............. <br /> <br />5. Interstate Constraints on Intrastate Water Rights... <br />a. The White River in Colorado as an Example...... <br /> <br />b. Assumptions Made by Recent Studies............. <br /> <br />E. Conclusions.............................................. <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />Page <br />16 <br />16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />20 <br />21 <br />21 <br />21 <br />23 <br />35 <br />37 <br />37 <br />37 <br />37 <br />39 <br />39 <br />.t;..... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.