Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />It <br />It <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />, <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />I <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />companies and irrigation districts might face a period of financial risk early on in the development of <br />secondary service. Undoubtedly, this will depend upon the growth in water user subscriptions (and <br />therefore the overall growth in a given secondary supply service area), the terms and size of the <br />repayment contract (assuming that these systems will be financed through bonds or state agency <br />financing), and the revenue (plant investment or "tap" fees) generated by the secondary water supply <br />system. <br /> <br />Historical Precedents <br /> <br />It is important to remember that the rural domestic water districts began much in the same way in <br />the 1960s. In order to initiate and capitalize these Title 32 districts, rural domestic organizers often went <br />from door-to-door in rural areas compiling a list of subscribers for their new potable water service. Once <br />the district boundaries and the number of potential customers was identified, it was often a simple matter <br />of determining what the capital costs for the water system would be, and what water rates would be <br />required to meet these capital costs and future annual operation and maintenance costs. It is likely that <br />the development of secondary supply systems, particularly if they are to be operated and maintained by <br />canal companies and irrigation districts, will follow a similar developmental process. This developmental <br />process is also discussed in the report. <br /> <br />Four traditional and well-established canal companies in Colorado, the New Cache La Poudre <br />Irrigating Company, the Highland Ditch Company, the Lake Canal Company and the Grand Valley <br />Irrigation Company participated as case studies to identify a "process of discovery" and assessment or <br />appraisal of their potential in providing secondary water supply service to residential-commercial- <br />industrial parcels in their traditional irrigation service areas. The Grand Valley Irrigation Company <br />already provides secondary water service indirectly, by delivering water through "historical" headgates to <br />its many affiliated lateral companies. The study provided assistance to the four canal companies in <br />developing a Geographical Information Systems (GIS) database and digital map of their respective <br />irrigation systems, including updated information on residential parcels, zoning, rural domestic water <br />district pipeline systems, municipal pipeline systems and urban growth boundaries overlapping their <br />service areas. <br /> <br />The study focused on the potential for secondary water systems in Water Districts 1,2,3,4,5, and 6 <br />in northeastern Colorado, in addition to the Grand Junction area. However, what was learned should be <br />directly applicable to all areas of Colorado. There appear to be many opportunities for pressurized <br />secondary water systems in this region as well as in other areas of the state. <br /> <br />Conclusion <br /> <br />In summary, the aim of the study was to identify the conditions under which dual systems can be <br />developed and made to work effectively, what the benefits are, how the participation of canal companies <br />and irrigation districts in pressurized secondary water supply may contribute to maintaining irrigated <br />agriculture as a viable industry in the region and the risks involved during development, how local <br />jurisdictions can help promote these systems through the passing of specific ordinances, where dual <br />systems are appropriate for the region, and specific recommendations for a state-wide "secondary system <br />policy" that would be clear and simple for the needs of the state, local jurisdictions, developers and <br />agricultural irrigation water suppliers. <br /> <br />The study has tried to ascertain ways in which dual systems contribute to both general public <br />interest goals and private property rights and benefits at the same time. Rather than advocating a strictly <br />market approach to water resource development in the state or, conversely, a strictly public interest <br />approach, the research has attempted to ascertain how these two perspectives can be optimized in the <br /> <br />9 <br />