Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />2. BACKGROUND <br /> <br />This section discusses recent weather modification policy statements and presents a historical <br />overview of winter orographic cloud seeding experimentation. Several factors are explored <br />which now make it possible to scientifically demonstrate that cloud seeding can enhance <br />mountain snowfall and subsequent runoff in the Colorado River. I <br /> <br />2.1 Weather Modification Policy Statements <br /> <br />Since 1957, several weather modification panel reports have stated that some winter <br />orographic cloud seeding projects appeared to augment precipitation (Advisory Committee on <br />Weather Control, 1957; National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, 1966; <br />National Academy of Sciences, 1973; Weather Modification Advisory Board, 1978). 'lWo recent <br />policy statements provide current scientific views on the status of cloud seeding technology. <br /> <br />The most recent weather modification policy statement of the 10,000 member AMS (American <br />Meteorological Society), published in the March 1992 issue of the Bulletin oftheAMS, indicates <br />that scientific proof remains elusive. The policy statement notes that, "There is considerable <br />evidence that, under certain conditions, precipitation from supercooled orographic clouds can be <br />increased with existing techniques. Statistical analyses of precipitation records from some <br />long-term projects indicate that seasonal increases on the order of 10 pct have been realized. <br />The cause and effect relationships have not been fully documented; however, the potential for <br />increases of this magnitude is supported by field measurements and numerical model <br />simulations." The policy statement further notes that, "The processes culminating in increased <br />precipitation have recently been directly observed during seeding experiments conducted over <br />limited spatial and temporal domains." These brief seeding experiments which affeicted small <br />areas were similar to, but less comprehensive than, the direct detection experiments discussed <br />in section 4. <br /> <br />The newest policy statement of the WMO (World Meteorological Organization), affiliated with <br />the United Nations, was approved in July 1992. Both the AMS and WMO policy statements <br />were prepared by panels of experts, the latter from several countries worldwide. 'The WMO <br />statement notes that, "In our present state of knowledge, it is considered that the glaciogenic <br />seeding of clouds or cloud systems either formed, or stimulated in development, by air flowing <br />over mountains offers the best prospects for increasing precipitation in an economically viable <br />manner." The policy statement notes that statistical analyses suggest 10 to 15 pct seasonal <br />precipitation increases in certain project areas. The statement continues, "Physical studies <br />using the new technology highlighted above, give convincing evidence of the production of an <br />effective seeding agent, the tracing of the agent to SLW portions of the cloud, the initiation and <br />development of ice crystals to precipitation size particles, and the fallout of additional <br />precipitation on mountain slopes in favorable situations over limited areas. Numerical <br />simulations of the process corroborate the physical studies. This does not imply the problem of <br />precipitation enhancement in such situations is solved Much work remains to be done in <br />pursuit of the goals of strengthening the results and producing incontrovertible statistical and <br />physical evidence that the increases occurred over a wide area, over a prolonged period of time <br />and with minimum, or positive, extra area effects." The goal of the CREST is to provide such <br />statistical and physical evidence in the Basin. <br /> <br />5 <br />