Laserfiche WebLink
<br />VII <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CONTENTS - continued <br /> <br />10. ADDITIONAL RELATED ANAL YSES.............................................................................................81 <br />lOa. Comparisons of TAR Ice Particle Concentrations for Seeded and Nonseeded EUs............... 81 <br />lOb. Comparison of2003/04 Experimental Period Precipitation to Long-Tenn Average ............85 <br />lOco Supercooled Liquid Water Availability and Implications for Seeding Potential................... 86 <br />IOd. Estimation of Possible Seasonal SWE Increases from Propane Seeding ..............................88 <br />1 Od.l. Estimation of Seasonal Percentage Increases of SWE........................................... 88 <br />10d.2. Speculation concerning Seasonal Volume Increases ofSWE ............................... 90 <br />lOe. Examination of Precipitation Gauge Network Observations ................................................. 91 <br />1 Oe.l. Comparisons of Daily Gauge Totals ...................................................................... 91 <br />10e.2. Distributions of Daily Precipitation ....................................................................... 94 <br />10e.3. Distributions of Hourly Precipitation .....................................................................94 <br />10f. Relationships between TAR SL W, Winds and Precipitation Rate ......................................... 97 <br />11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................................................. 100 <br /> <br />11 a. Overview.......... .......... ........ .................. ............. ................. ....... ............. ......... ............ ........ 100 <br />11 b. Statistical Conclusions ........ ............ ............... ................. ........... ........... ...................... ......... 102 <br />11 c. Estimated Precipitation Increases... ........ ......... ............ ............ ........... ............ ............ .......... 103 <br />lId. Recommendations for Further Development of Propane Seeding...................................... 103 <br /> <br />ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............... ........................, .................................... ............. .......... .......... ......... 104 <br /> <br />REFERENCES ........ ........ ........... ......... .......... .................... ........... ............. .......... ..................... ................ 105 <br /> <br />APPENDIX A - Statistical Tests Applied to Regression ........................................................................ 109 <br />APPENDIX B - Listing of Experimental Units ...................................................................................... 112 <br />APPENDIX C -- Public Data Access ...................................................................................................... 114 <br /> <br />Tables <br /> <br />Tabk Page <br /> <br />1. Instrumented sites used for the 2003/04 experiment, ordered by distance from HAS................... 20 <br /> <br />2. Utah propane seeding experiment sites and instrumentation......................................................... 21 <br /> <br />3. Periods with no TAR ACSII and/or 2D-C imagery data for six or more hours............................. 33 <br /> <br />4. Summary of significance testing for regression fits to target-control data .................................... 46 <br /> <br />5. Summary of pairs analysis for all 47 available EU pairs ............................................................... 50 <br /> <br />6. Summary of the Wilcoxon tests using all 98 EUs ......................................................................... 51 <br /> <br />7. Summary of ratio analyses for all 98 EUs :.................................................................................... 52 <br /> <br />8. Summary of tests using all 98 available EUs with no partitioning ................................................53 <br /> <br />9. HAS direction partition: from 169 to 270 deg inc\usive................................................................ 54 <br /> <br />10. Summary ofSWE observations for 29 EUs with HAS median wind directions greater than 270 <br /> <br />deg....... .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ ....... ............ .............. .......... ... ........... ............. ........ ......... 55 <br /> <br />11. Icing Partition: icing detected at one or more of the following: HAS, SIR, TAR and TSO.......... 57 <br />