My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00412
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00412
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:38:42 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 11:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Final Report on Utah Cloud Seeding Experimentation Using Propane During the 2003/04 Winter
Date
3/1/2005
State
UT
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />was provided both by considering the mean residuals from the pairs testing and from the mean double <br />ratio testing <br /> <br />II <br /> <br />Two other single partitions were attempted, and a number of dual partitions with one always HAS wind <br />directions of270 deg or less. That direction requirement alone reduced the population size to 69 EUs and <br />any second partition would reduce it further so dual partitioning attempts were recognized as challenging. <br />Detecting a real seeding effect at an acceptable level of statistical significance becomes problematic with <br />a small sample population. A number of the results were somewhat suggestive of seeding effectiveness. <br />Examples include when SL W was detected by icing rate sensors, when the warmer half of the EUs were <br />tested using HAS temperatures, and especially when the largest natural snowfall periods were elIminated <br />by limiting the control gauge SWE per EU to 0.05 inch. While the latter dual partition was quite <br />suggestive of seeding-caused snowfall increases, none of the additional partitions provided results as <br />convincing as the wind direction partition. Most of the resulting suggestions should be regarded more as <br />tantalizing than as conclusive. The underlying problem was very likely the limited population sizes being <br />tested when any two partitions were applied. If any actual seeding effects existed, the available sample <br />size was too limited to detect them to an acceptable level of statistical significance. Such results should <br />be considered inconclusive, neither demonstrating an actual seeding effect nor the lack of one. Only <br />testing a larger population than available would offer the possibility of providing more definitive: results. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The most solid and important results of the statistical testing can be summarized as follows. It is highly <br />likely that a real seeding effect resulted from propane seeding when transport winds carried the seeding <br />plume over the target gauges. Overall, seeded units provided at least 20% more snowfall than nonseeded <br />units. If all hours containing the 69 EUs with proper targeting had been operationally seeded, the <br />estimated likely outcome would have been an increase of8% in the "seasonal" precipitation averaged for <br />gauges GTR and GSC during the 3.5 month period of experimentation. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />A case study analysis was performed for three adjoining EUs on 21 December 2003, with two of the <br />EUs nonseeded and the middle EU seeded. By chance, this particular seeded EU coincided with a time <br />period having minimal natural snowfall, seldom observed during other EUs. The adjoining nonseeded <br />EUs had considerably more SWE than the seeded EU, both with highest accumulations at the control <br />gauge. But that gauge had only 0.009 inch during the seeded period while target gauges had 2 to 4 times <br />as much'SWE, increasing with distance downwind of the seeding site. The most convincing evidence that <br />seeding produced much of the increase was provided by examination of2D-C probe ice particle images <br />from TAR which were very similar to those published from pulsed seeding experiments conducted during <br />earlier winters. The seeded images were relatively small, generally uniform in size and shape and were in <br />much higher concentrations than observed during the adjoining nonseeded periods. Even with <br />conservative assumptions, it was estimated that seeded snowfall rates exceeded 0.010 inch h-l at the core <br />target gauges and likely approached twice that rate at the downwind gauge. Such seeding-produced <br />precipitation rates are in good agreement with earlier cases study experiments in Utah and elsewhere in <br />the Intermountain West. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />While such rates are light snowfall, about half of all hours with detectable natural snowfall fall at the <br />rate of 0.010 inch h'! or less in the experimental area. Frequent hours with light snowfall are common at <br />higher elevations in the Intermountain West. The seasonal contribution of light snowfall is important <br />because of its high frequency of occurrence. Increasing the snowfall rate by 0.0 I 0 inch h-! for 200 hours <br />would result in a seasonal increase of 10% for a normal November through March winter, based on long- <br />term snow pillow observations in the experimental area. Examination of past icing rate sensor and other <br />SL W data from the Wasatch Plateau revealed that approximately 200 hours with available SL W could be <br />expected during a typical five month winter. Consequently, there is some statistical and physical basis to <br />expect that propane seeding might produce a seasonal S WE increase in the vicinity of 10% in thl~ limited <br />target area examined. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />lV <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.