Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />The first storm after installation began on 14 December with typical southwest flow at the HAS. A plot <br />of the frequency shift with time for the period before and during the first EU showed exactly what was <br />expected (see Fig. 12). The frequency decreased with time in an almost linear fashion from the ice free <br />value near 40,000 Hz to 39,400 Hz at which point the heater was automatically turned on to melt ice off <br />the sensing rod assembly. Heating resulted in the frequency rapidly increasing back to the ice free value <br />over about 3 min. Icing appeared to be very rapid as the frequency quickly decreased again after reaching <br />40,000 Hz and the decrease continued past the end of the 40 min EU. The sensor appeared to be <br />functioning just as expected. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />40000 <br /> <br />39500 <br /> <br /> <br />Experimental Unit <br />starting 1733 MST <br />on 14 Dee. 2003 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />39900 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />N <br />~ 39800 <br />tI' <br />l!! <br />11. <br />... <br />0 <br />U) <br />c:: <br />Q) 39700 <br />en <br />Cl <br />c:: <br />:!;! <br />.r: <br /><) <br />'C <br />"Q <br />~ 39600 <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />39400 <br />o <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />10 15 20 25 30 <br />Minutes Into Experimental Unit <br /> <br />35 <br /> <br />40 <br /> <br />Fig. 12. Frequency versus time from the Goodrich icing rate sensor during the first EU on 14 December 2003. <br />The heater automatically removed ice from the sensor rod when the frequency reached 39,400 Hz. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />After the second EU of the first pair, the HAS wind shifted from southwest to west-northwest and <br />remained there for the remainder of the storm passage of 14-15 December. An additional 20 EUs were <br />triggered by the icing sensor using the 34 Hz threshold. However, none of them are believed to be valid <br />EUs in that the SL W cloud droplets were approaching the sensing rod from a rear quarter. That fact, <br />combined with improperly tilted sensing rod, likely resulted in a very uneven pattern of rime ice buildup <br />along the rod, evidenced by a quite noisy frequency record with the frequency increasing and decreasing <br />over a range from few to over 100 Hz. But the decrease was never sufficient to reach the 39,400 Hz <br />heater trip point before the storm's end. Frequency values were plotted for each 40 min EU and linear <br />regression equations were fitted to the 1 min observations. Some of the EUs showed gradual decreases in <br />frequency over time, some gradual increases and some essential no change over the 40 min period. <br />However, 34 Hz or greater decreases were frequent enough in the noisy data to trigger the many <br />additional EUs with west-northwest flow. They and similar suspicious EUs from other northwest flow <br />periods, discussed below, have been kept in the pool of all EUs as required by the randomized design. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />25 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />