Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />by local terrain. The vertical separation between the HAS and TAR is about 300 m. The seeding plume <br />would be expected to disperse 300 to 600 m higher than the TAR according to considerable past airborne <br />plume tracking and modeling studies (e.g., Heimbach et al. 1998). Plume dispersion may be caused by a <br />combination of routine mechanical turbulence related to airflow interactions with rugged mountainous <br />terrain, sometimes present weak embedded convection, and the buoyancy caused by the heat of phase <br />change during seeded ice crystal growth as discussed by Fukuta (1996). Direct fallout of individual <br />seeded ice particles from the plume top to surface gauges is considered unlikely with the possible <br />exception of the most downwind target gauge, GDN. However, seeded ice particles could be carried a <br />significant vertical distance above the terrain downwind of the HAS and still fall into target gauges if a <br />significant growth mechanism was present. The most likely means of transporting higher level seeded <br />crystals onto surface gauges are: (1) by aggregation of many seeded crystals into snowflakes with much <br />larger fall velocities than individual crystals, (2) by natural snowflakes falling through the seeded crystal <br />plume, colliding with and sweeping out (scavenging) many of much smaller seeded crystals and carrying <br />them to the ground (also aggregation), and (3) by accretional growth (riming) of snowflakes containing <br />seeded crystals in the SL W rich environment which often exists in the cloudy air forced up the windward <br />slopes of the plateau. These aggregation and accretion growth processes could explain the apparent <br />seeding effects found in snowcourses only 4 kIn downwind of a high altitude Agl generator used during <br />the Bridger Range Experiment in Montana, reported by Super and Heimbach (1983), and from a later <br />operational/research program using the same AgI seeding site discussed by Heimbach and Super (1988). <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Operations on a 24/7 basis are quite expensive if field technicians are required around the clock. This <br />was avoided by using an icing rate sensor at the HAS to determine the existence of SL W. A Goodrich <br />icing rate sensor, Model 0872F 1, was used to determine when SL W was present at the HAS seeding site. <br />Whenever the rate of icing exceeded a threshold, the next two hour block was "declared" an EU pair by a <br />programmed data logger no matter what subsequently happened to cloud and weather conditions. Of <br />course, SL W presence just prior to the beginning of the two hour experimental block provides no <br />guarantee that it will continue to be present throughout the period. However, the probability of continued <br />SLW availability, especially during the first EU of the pair, is much enhanced over any other available <br />approach of declaring an experimental period. It will be recalled that SL W must be available at the HAS, <br />or not far above it in the case of ice saturation at the HAS altitude, in order for seeding potential to exist. <br />Otherwise the embryonic seeding crystals will soon sublimate back into water vapor. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Once seedable conditions were measured by the icing rate sensor, and the start of a two hour <br />experimental period was declared, the same programmed data logger made a random decision to seed <br />either the first or second EU of the pair. The data logger controlled the three propane dispensers near the <br />HAS, releasing propane for exactly 40 min. All dispensers had two nozzles separated across the wind by <br />3 m. As with previous Utah and Sierra Nevada testing, the propane output per nozzle was approximately <br />3.5 gal h-I, equivalent to 1.9 gm S-I. According to previously cited laboratory and field investigations, the <br />expected ice crystal production per nozzle would be about 1012 seeded crystals per second. The center <br />dispenser was about 6 m northeast (downwind) of the HAS tower and the other two dispensers were about <br />30 m northwest and southeast (generally crosswind) of the center disperser. This configuration should <br />have reduced aggregation of embryonic seeded ice crystals near the dispensers, resulting in higher <br />concentrations downwind as the seeding plume approached target gauges. Based on earlier work <br />discussed by Holroyd and Super (1998), it was expected that seeded ice crystal concentrations at the TAR <br />would be approximately 50 to 60 L'(. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4. ANALYSES OF PRIOR PLUME TRACING AND SEEDING EXPERIMENTS <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Important observations collected on the Wasatch Plateau during the 1990s were known to be of <br />significant interest for closer examination of HAS seeding plumes trajectories and their relationships with <br />wind observations. However, these data were believed to have been lost over the years until rediscovered <br />during the summer of 2004. The observations had never been analyzed in a manner suitable to address <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />