Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Pass experiments. Newer developments were not to be included so that a <br />definite level of existing technology could bE! tested. Proj ect design and equip- <br />ment would remain essentially unaltered during the proj ect period. Other <br />pilot projects could be implemented to test new developments when solid evi- <br />dence of improved seeding results or efficiency were obtained. <br />The Colorado River Basin Pilot Project was to concentrate on evalu- <br />ating the additional precipitation resulting from large-scale seeding. Emphasis <br />was to be placed on studying the associated social and environmental problems <br />of seeding and the total operational costs of seeding. It was also planned to <br />provide limited observations to learn more about the physical and dynamic <br />processes involved in the atmosphere between the release of silver iodide from <br />the generator to measurement of snow on the ground. Supplementalobserva- <br />tions were proposed to utilize the opportunities provided by large-scale seeding <br />for studying and increasing man's knowledgE~ of seeding processes. <br /> <br />1. 3 PROJECT AREA <br />The Colorado River Basin Pilot Proj ect as established in Colorado State <br />University's design initially included a 3,300 square mile area in the San Juan <br />Mountains of southwestern Colorado (Figure 1-1) where elevations generally <br />exceed 9,500 feet. This is the area where deep snowpacks accumulate averaging <br />up to 7 feet, equivalent to 30 inches of water. During the winter season, mid- <br />October through mid-May, precipitation averages 24 inches over the area with <br />over 40 inches received on the high ridges and peaks. Seeding experiments at <br />Climax Colorado and at Wolf Creek Pass indicate snowfall in this area could be <br />increased as much as 30 to 35 percent each winter season by seeding all favor- <br />able events. <br />The proj ect area was divided into four subareas according to the wind <br />directions most significant in producing snowfall in each area. These were <br />numbered in their respective priority for best seeding with Subarea 1 having the <br />most favorable seeding opportunities with more warm, moist, southwest flow <br />situations, best conditions and access for evaluation, and least expected social <br />and environmental problems. Subarea 4 has the least number of favorable seed- <br />ing opportunities with more cold northwest flow storms, more rugged access for <br />evaluation, more complex terrain, and more social and environmental problems, <br />including the severe avalanche area on Red Mountain Pass. <br /> <br />1-3 <br />