Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1.12 <br /> <br />The engines were started at 13:15, PST and this is apparent in the <br />SF6 noise level increase. Takeoff occurred at 13:32 and the aircraft <br />climbed to about 2400 m ASL. The SF6 instrument was readjusted at 13:44. <br />The climb is annotated A, Band C at 13:36, 13:42 and 13:46. The chart is <br />also labeled along the track at A, Band C so there is a direct reference <br />between strip chart times and aircraft positions. <br /> <br />Figure 1.3 shows encounters with the SF6 at 13:49, 13:53, 14:05, 14:10, <br />etc. The chart scale was changed at about 14:36 to expand the scale by a <br />factor of five so it would be easier to follow. The map, Figure 1.7, shows <br />the ground release point for the SF6 on the experiment of 22 April 1985 as <br />a broad arrow. The thin arrows show the hill around which the aircraft <br />concentrated its sampling path. The SF6 drifted roughly in the direction <br />of the broad arrow. The day was clear and sunny, with continuous convec- <br />tion and a moderate wind until later in the day. <br /> <br />In Figure 1.4, the chart shows race track patterns which correspond with <br />turns near the narrow arrows in Figure 1.7. In Figure 1.4 there are strong <br />SF6 traces recorded at 15:24, 29, 33-1/2, 38, 41-1/2, 46 and 50 (last are <br />,in Figure 5). These are near positions (A-B), C, 0, E, F, G and B which <br />locate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 as marked over the chart of Figure 1.4. <br /> <br />The observed positions for the SF6 are clustered on the northwestern <br />flanks of the mountain, near the 5513 ft peak, on the upwind side but on <br />the downwind side they are further to the south. one chart division in <br />latitude is 24/5 nautical miles, or about 5 NM. <br /> <br />The points on Figure 1.4 with the crosses are copied from Figure 1.5, <br />where the major SF6 detection points are marked. <br /> <br />The comparison of the points on Figure 1.4 with the release point <br />marked on the map, where distances are about the same scale, suggests an <br />apparent change in the drift direction from about 1100T to l600T after <br />crossing the peak. <br /> <br />There is a strong correlation between altitude changes and SF6 signal <br />which is evident from the plot. There is little doubt, however, that no <br />SF6 was detected upstream from points 4 and 5 in Figure 1.5 on the higher <br />run, at a location just before point K. on the following reverse leg there <br />does seem to be some SF6 after point L. The aircraft altitude was reduced <br />by about 500 ft to about 110 or 200 ft above terrain for the detection at <br />points 4 and 5. Since SF6 was not found at one of the higher runs upstream <br />this seems to indicate that the SF6 may tend to remain close to the ground <br />even when there is appreciable convection. <br /> <br />Flights were conducted on the following dates: 26 March, and 7, 9, <br />10, 11 and 22 April 1985. The flight yielding most information was the <br />22 April mission. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />