My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00395
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:29 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 10:37:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Weather Modification Reporting Program - 1973-1978
Date
6/1/1979
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Local community sponsorship of weather modifi.cation activities dropped <br />sharply in CY 1978. Municipal water or conservation district sponsorship <br />is slowly decreasing, but State sponsorship is increasing sharply. Public <br />utility sponsors are few and show no drastic changes. There is no appaY4::!nt <br />trend in the number of Federally sponsored projects during the 6 years. <br /> <br />Target Areas and Locations <br /> <br />The number of States with weather modification activities peaked in CY 1975. <br />Several projects covered adjoining States, for example, California and Nevada. <br />A review of the reported target locations clearly shows that the States '\Test <br />of the Mississippi River have most of the yearly activities. In the eastern <br />part of the United States, Illinois, Michigan, Delaware, 'and Georgia have had <br />operational weather modification projects. <br /> <br />The total target area for activities in the United States has increased <br />each year, even allowing for the anomalous peak of CY 1977. Although thE~ <br />total target area ranges from 3 to 8 percent of the area of the United <br />States, at no time during any year are all activities underway at the sm~e <br />time. Thus. on any one ,day, the total target area would be quite small. <br />There is good indication that the average target area for nonfog '8ctivitie,s <br />exhibits a general upward trend over the years. The average area for CY <br />1973-75 is 43 percent more than the average for CY 1976-78. <br /> <br />Duration of Modification Activities <br /> <br />The total number of days on which weather modification was attempted ,varied <br />from year to year as did the number of days devoted to attempts to increase <br />precipitation. Fog modification days for ,each year also showed no specific <br />trend. ' <br /> <br />The hours during which fog or cloud seeding was carried out from aircraft <br />indicated no certain trend over the reporting period. However, the hours of <br />ground-based operation showed a definite increasing trend. <br /> <br />Seeding Agents <br /> <br />The use of dry ice (C02) to increase airport visibility in periods of <br />supercooled fog, to create clearings in stratus clouds, or to increase <br />precipitation in other cloud formations generally was greater until CY 1978 <br />when usage dropped sharply. The peak year for seeding with silver iodide <br />was 1975. The Air Force relied on liquid propane vented to the atmosphere <br />in order to alleviate supercooled fog at two of its airports in the UnitE!d <br />States; however, no obvious trend was observed in the data. The peak year <br />for using po1yelectrolytes to dissipate warm fog was 1975; during 1978, <br />this chemical compound was not reported for any activity. <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.