My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00395
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00395
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:29 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 10:37:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Weather Modification Reporting Program - 1973-1978
Date
6/1/1979
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
75
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />threat to life, property, or the environment. Seeding activities were <br />also to be suspended immediately whenever the National Weather Service <br />issued a severe thunderstorm or tornado warning which the project of- <br />ficials believed could be related to clouds in the target area. In <br />addition, seeding would either not be undertaken or would be terminated <br />whenever the HIPLEX radar facility was inoperative or when the air-to- <br />ground communications equipment was inoperative. <br /> <br />In preparing for Project FACE, NOAA considered the possible environ- <br />mental impact of the seeding activity. The effects of'increased rain- <br />fall on crops was studied, and particular attention was given to the <br />tomato crops. The effects of the seeding agent, silver iodide, were <br />also noted. The EIS for Project FACE stated the following: <br /> <br />"Tomatoes are grown in the target area during the winter, spring <br />and early summer. This is a rain-sensitive crop, particularly <br />during ripening stage. Obviously increased rainfall from seeding <br />at this time would have an adverse effect on this crop. As in pre- <br />vious years NOAA will closely coordinate the scheduling of the seeding <br />activities with the agricultural and other interests in the target <br />area, and attempt to keep all other interested citizens informed <br />on the nature of the project. <br /> <br />"There are no known adverse effects from the silver iodide (AgI) <br />-used for seeding. The U.S. Public Health Service Drinking Water <br />Standards of 1962 require that the 'silver content of drinking <br />water be less than 0.05 parts per million'; there are no standards <br />with regard to iodide. On an average day of seeding approximately <br />1.5 x 104 gm of silver iodide are expended and 3.0 x 1013 gm of <br />rain falls. If this silver iodide is evenly distributed in the <br />rainwater, the silver content of the water would be 0.5 parts per <br />billion ---- well within the U.S. Public Health Standards for <br />drinking water. Measurements of silver in rainwater during FACE <br />1973 and 1975 substantiated this expectation. The silver iodide <br />that does not combine with water should stay in the atmosphere <br />for days, months, or years and be dispersed over a very large area <br />with proportionately sma1ler'concentrations. In the event that the <br />experiments are successful and cloud seeding is carried out on a <br />regular, operational basis, the environmental impact should be <br />reassessed." <br /> <br />Nonfederal Activities <br /> <br />Among the States, legislation and regulation on weather modification <br />vary from none to complete. A few States require the preparation of <br />environmental impact reports prior to initiation of weather modifica- <br />tion projects. In general, State-directed programs address the <br />potential adverse effects of weather modification and provide for <br />strict supervision and evaluation of projects. At the local level, <br />privately sponsored efforts to clear fog, increase precipitation, or <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.