Laserfiche WebLink
<br />IV. SUPPRESSION OF WEATHER HAZARDS 615 <br /> <br />hail suppression will be available in the near fu- <br />ture. It is unclear why the apparent results from <br />the Soviet Union and in some other operational <br />programs have not been duplicated in the ran- <br />domized experiments in Switzerland and the <br />United States referred to earlier. Possible rea- <br />sons for the discrepancies include the small <br />sizes of the experimental areas used, which did <br />not provide very large samples of test cases, dif- <br />ferences in procedures for declaring hail threats <br />and conducting the seeding operations, and vari- <br />ations in the characteristics of storms in differ- <br />ent parts of the world. A final possibility, which <br />has been rejected vigorously by Soviet scientists <br />at international meetings, is that the target-con- <br />trol analyses performed in the Soviet Union <br />paint an overly optimistic picture of the results <br />actually being obtained in that country. <br /> <br />D. LIGHTNING SUPPRESSION <br /> <br />Attempts to suppress lightning have generally <br />taken one of two forms. The first is to seed <br />clouds in an attempt to modify the microphysi- <br />cal properties in such a way as to reduce the <br />amount of electric charge separation taking <br />place and thereby reduce the frequency of light- <br />ning strikes. The second is to seed the clouds <br />with radar chaff in the hope that the chaff nee- <br />dles will provide enough corona discharge to <br />neutralize the strong electric fields giving rise to <br />lightning discharges. <br />Experiments using the former concept have <br />been carried out in several countries. For sev- <br />eral years, the U.S. Forest Service conducted <br />Project Skyfire in western Montana to test the <br />effects of silver iodide seeding from ground gen- <br />erators on the frequency and characteristics of <br />lightning discharges. The statistical analyses of <br />this randomized program provided some evi- <br />dence of a decrease in the frequency of the types <br />of cloud-to-ground discharges considered most <br />likely to ignite forest fires. However, little fol- <br />low-up action has been taken. Scientists in the <br />Soviet Union have also studied lightning sup- <br />pression, and a number of projects conducted <br />for other purposes, for example, hail suppres- <br />sion, have been analyzed in terms of the fre- <br />quency of lightning discharges. This work has <br />not led to any conclusive or widely accepted <br />results so far. <br />The concept of chaff seeding to preempt natu- <br />ral lightning strikes has been explored in theo- <br />retical calculations and in a few limited field ex- <br /> <br />periments. The idea appears to have some merit, <br />but insufficient field trials have been carried out <br />to permit any statement to be made regarding its <br />potential effectiveness. <br />A complete model of the effects of cloud seed- <br />ing on lightning discharges requires analysis <br />with a numerical model capable of simulating <br />the various charge separation processes active <br />in thunderstorms. As scientists still are not sure <br />of the nature of the several mechanisms hypoth- <br />esized to be at work, nor of their relative impor- <br />tance, the seeding conducted so far must be con- <br />sidered as empirical experiments. <br /> <br />E. SUPPRESSION OF THUNDERSTORM WINDS <br /> <br />It was hypothesized early in the history of <br />weather modification that both the weakening of <br />convective storms by premature release of pre- <br />cipitation through cloud seeding and the shading <br />of the ground by artificially generating large cir- <br />rus anvils would reduce the severity of thunder- <br />storm winds. It was thus hypothesized that <br />seeding thunderstorms in the vicinity of crops <br />susceptible to wind damage would be beneficial. <br />Among crops most susceptible to wind damage <br />are bananas. Therefore, a number of operational <br />programs were conducted in Central and South <br />America during the 1950s and 1960s to reduce <br />wind damage to banana plantations. Data pre- <br />sented by the operators painted an optimistic <br />picture of the results, but the programs have <br />been discontinued in most of the countries af- <br />fected. <br /> <br />F. SUPPRESSION OF TORNADOES <br /> <br />There have not been any cloud seeding exper- <br />iments intended to modify the behavior of torna- <br />does. Before such an experiment could be un- <br />dertaken, it would be necessary to derive <br />numerical models capable of predicting tornado <br />occurrence and explaining their energy sources <br />and sinks. At the present time there are no ac- <br />tive tornado suppression programs anywhere in <br />the world. <br /> <br />G. MODIFICATION OF HURRICANES: <br />PROJECT STORMFURY <br /> <br />In 1947, as a part of Project Cirrus, dry ice <br />was dropped into convective clouds associated <br />with a tropical hurricane off the east coast of the <br />United States. In reporting the event, Langmuir <br />stated that it would some day be possible to af- <br />