My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00390
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00390
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:25 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 10:36:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Proposed Wintertime Weather Modification Research Program for Colorado
Date
1/1/1980
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />should be completed to deterlnine precipitation changes over the <br />total primary program area that was shown in Figure 8. Secondly, <br />a similar type of evaluation shou~d be completed over the portion <br />of the primary area most likely to be affected by seeding. In <br />Section IV.b.3 it was stated that the northern portion of the <br />primary area (Pl) favors sou,thwest flow precipitation episodes <br />while the southern half (P2) favors northwest flow precipitation <br />episodes. It is possible to have both flow situations occur <br />during different stages of the same weather event; for example, <br />initial flow could be from the southwest with flow changing to <br />the northwest following the passage of a mid-level pressure trough. <br />For the first type of evalua1:ion the entire primary area would be <br />considered as a unit for the duration of the event. The second <br />type of evaluation would divide the event at the time of trough <br />passage (as determined from program rawinsonde data), This second <br />type of evaluation also becornes important when only portions of <br />the primary target area can be effectively seeded because of <br />marginal wind directions for the established generator network <br />or operational aircraft flight paths upwind of the area. <br />Different types of evaluation techniques may be utilized <br />such as seeded inter-basin comparisons of precipitation and <br />runoff with current data and historical data,-comparisons of <br />similar basins (one seeded and one not seeded) in their precipita- <br />tion and runoff amounts, comparison of computer model outputs for <br />natural and seeded amounts for the seeded region and nearby un- <br />seeded region with actual precipitation observations in both the <br />seeded and unseeded areas, and a statistical comparison of ran- <br />domly seeded and unseeded similar weather events. <br />The evaluation for seedi.ng effects would be based on hourly <br />precipitation accumulations reduced from the surface recording <br />precipitation gage network. The strongest statistical tests <br />available for comparing randomized seeded and non-seeded data sets <br />would be utilized. These sta.tistical analyses should test the <br />hypothesis that cloud seeding' utilizing the methods proposed <br />increases winter precipitation within the target area. As was <br />stated in Section IV.B.2.e, t.he cumulative precipitation during <br /> <br />-43- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.