Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />that seeded crystals formed over the windward slope would typically have about 30 min growth <br />time while crossing the mesa. <br /> <br />Exclusion of mesa-top precipitation rates exceeding 0.15 mm h-1 (0.006 inch h-1) resulted in <br />the removal of many hours with no SL W during conditions otherwise favoring its formation; that <br />is, southwest flow of moist air at relatively warm supercooled temperatures. It might be expected <br />that moderate to heavy snowfall rates would convert all available SL W to snow. However, that <br />precipitation rate exclusion criterion also removed over 50% of the high-SL W data, <br />demonstrating that much SL W was often present during periods of significant natural snowfall. <br />This finding is contrary to suggestions from the Park Range, but in agreement with recent <br />observations from the Wasatch Plateau of Utah (Super and Heimbach 2005a). Even heavy <br />natural snowfall does not always remove all available SL W, especially when its production rate is <br />high because of relatively strong winds forcing moist air up and over mountain barriers. This <br />result is at variance with the concept that storms producing moderate to heavy snowfall rates are <br />not seedable. <br /> <br />Boe and Super (1986) defined a "SL W episode" as the continuous presence of radiometer- <br />observed SL W for longer than 2 h. If SL W was again detected within 2 h of the first 2 h block, <br />the episode was considered to be continuing. A total of 115 episodes resulted from the 5-mo <br />dataset, with 50% of them less than 3 h in duration. Only 12% were longer than 12 h. However, <br />the 50% of episodes less than 3 h long contained only 14% of the total hours of S L W while <br />episodes longer than 5 h comprised 80% of the total hours. <br /> <br />A distribution was given of 1 h average SL W amounts observed by the radiometer (their Fig. <br />5). The distribution was highly skewed, with 57% of all SL W hours having 0.10 mm or less, and <br />the median value 0.08 mm. When converted to SL W flux by considering the wind speed, those <br />many hours with 0.10 mm or less contributed only 16% of the total flux for the five months. The <br />relatively infrequent hours with high SL W amounts contributed significant fractions of the total <br />flux. This skewed distribution might be anticipated, and has since been found over other <br />mountain barriers. It has long been known that snowfall rates, which require SL W presence, are <br />also highly skewed. Many hours have very light snowfall rates and relatively few hours have <br />heavy rates. <br /> <br />Rauber, R. M., L. O. Grant, D. Feng and J. B. Snider, 1986: The characteristics and distribution of cloud <br />water over the mountains of north em Colorado during wintertime storms. Part I: Temporal variations. J. <br />Climate Applied Meteorology, 25, 468-488. <br /> <br />A scanning dual channel microwave radiometer was operated at 15 deg tilt above the horizon, <br />scanned through 360 deg of azimuth about every 15 min. The unit was in a "hole" near <br />Steamboat Springs, at an elevation of2050 m (6726 ft), with a minor ridge to the west and major <br />ridge, the Park Range, to the east (see their Fig. 2). Time histories of SL W content were shown <br />by azimuth. Greatest SL W amounts were consistently over the windward (west-facing) slopes of <br />the Park Range. This finding indicates that forced uplift of moist air over the barrier, sometimes <br />associated with the release of weak embedded convection, produced the zone with greatest SLW <br />amounts. Thus, the most seedable zone would be expected to be over the windward slopes of the <br />main mountain barrier. A secondary maximum was often observed over the minor ridge west of <br />the radiometer. Unfortunately, the radiometer location required that its beam scan some distance <br />above the windward slopes to avoid viewing the rugged terrain. A better location would have <br />been at the SPL, elevation 10,370 ft, and due east of the radiometer on the west edge of the <br /> <br />33 <br />