My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00383
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00383
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:19 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 10:36:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Simulation of Winter Precipitation in Western Mountain Watersheds with a Local-Scale Model
Date
11/1/1992
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />*'~ <br /> <br />. <br />... <br /> <br />because comparisons of 100-yr type, base, and doubled-C02 precipitation, <br />are likely to be most meaningful with monthly or seasonal totals as <br />opposed to daily amounts. However, the nested models need to, at least, <br />moderately approximate the watershed daily precipitation distribution to <br />properly study such features as extreme events and various impacts on <br />ground cover. Consequently, nested modeling of historical periods needs <br />to be followed by comparison studies of precipitation amounts and also <br />precipitation distribution. <br /> <br />Only a brief description of the LSPM is given in the following <br />because Rhea (1977) 'presents thorough coverage and Medina (1991) <br />discussed some of the more important moc~l features. The model domain <br />and input data are described. Results are given separately for winter <br />periods and for summers because the mode!l performance depends on storm <br />type. Additional sections discuss input data and present some <br />conclusions. <br /> <br />MODEL DESCRIP~rION <br /> <br />The model simulates precipitation primarily through an accounting <br />of water condensed and evaporated as moist layers interact with the <br />orography. It can simulate only the most important physical processes <br />that lead to orographic precipitation, not the more complex cloud <br />processes. One advantage of such a simple model is the ease of <br />performing many runs on a relatively inexpensive microcomputer or work <br />station. <br /> <br />An important shortcoming of the modE:!l is its inability to properly <br />simulate convective precipitation. Consequently, estimates are more <br />accurate during winter, when precipitation occurs largely as a response <br />to the orography, than summer, when convection plays a dominant role. <br /> <br />As inputs, the model requires only routinely collected rawinsonde <br />data interpolated at 50-rob pressure levels from the surface to 300 rob. <br />For each sounding period, the outputs grenerated include estimates of <br />precipi tation for each domain grid point and selected locations, such as <br />gauge sites. The model integrates precipitation over selected time <br />periods such as daily, monthly, or seasonal. Volume precipitation is <br />developed for designated areas such as a particular watershed. Volume <br />precipitation integrated over selected periods can be employed in <br />regressions to estimate runoff (Rhea, 1977; Medina, 1981). <br /> <br />The equation (Rhea, 1977) employed by the model for computation of <br />a mean precipitation rate, f~I+l' between grid points I and I+l that are <br />separated by distance, ~x, is <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />(~/,l+l)/ = <br /> <br />EV/I:1P, <br />A (Q/ + I:1Cl/+1)/ <br />pwg~x . <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />where <br />1 = <br />V, = <br />M = <br /> <br />Computational layer in question <br />Horizontal wind speed in x direction at grid upwind edge <br />Pressure thickness of the inflowing layer at upwind edge <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.