Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1.0 INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />1.1 Background <br /> <br />On December 3, 1986, Dr. Michael D. High, Director of the Division of Energy <br />Demonstrations and Technology, and Mr. Bevan W. Brown, Director of Air and Water <br />Resources of the TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority), visited Dr. Bernard A. <br />Silverman and Mr. John C. Lease of the DARR (Division of Atmospheric Resources <br />Research), USBR (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation), in Denver, Colorado. The purpose <br />of the visit was to explore the possibilities of a cooperative project betwe~n <br />the USBR and the TVA to investigate the feasibility of implementing a precipita- <br />tion enhancement program in the Tennessee Valley region. They stated that <br />increased precipitation would augment streamflow and reservoir storage which <br />could be highly beneficial during some periods. <br /> <br />It was decided to send DARR representatives to the offices of the TVA to further <br />explore requirements and possibilities with TVA personnel. Accordingly, Mr. <br />John C. Lease and Dr. Arlin B. Super met with several TVA managers and technical <br />personnel on January 20-22, 1987, in Knoxville, Tennessee. <br /> <br />The Knoxville meetings were very productive and clarified" several issues. The <br />recent 2-year drought in the TVA region caused s~vere problems in system opera- <br />tion. In particular, low streamflows markedly reduced hydroelectrical power <br />generation capacity (hydropower). The,shortfall required that other much more <br />expensive power' generating sources (e.g., coal-fired plants, combustion tur- <br />bines) be utilized to a greater than normal extent. This resulted in higher <br />costs to consumers and possibly greater air pollution. Other TVA system <br />problems caused by the drought included degradations in water quality and in <br />recreational uses due to seVere reservoir drawdown and low streamflows. While <br />the TVA usually has adequate water to meet basic needs, additional water would <br />often allow the overall system to be more nearly optimized and lower priority <br />needs to be met. <br /> <br />Discussions during the Knoxville meetings revealed that wintertime precipitation <br />augmentation would usually serve little purpose for the TVA. Reservoirs are <br />generally drawn down to their minimum levels by the end of December to provide <br />flood protection. The heaviest, widespread precipitation events with greatest <br />general flooding potential usually occur with winter storms (especially slow <br />moving lows). By mid-March reservoir filling begins and it is required that <br />summer levels be reached by mid-to-late May to adequately meet seasonal demands. <br />The March 15 - May 31 period is, therefore, most critical for adequate rainfall. <br /> <br />Another important result of the Knoxville meetings was the identification of the <br />four highest priority areas for rainfall augmentation. Together these encompass <br />most of the northeastern tip of Tennessee (generally east .of a north-south line <br />through Knoxville), as well as western North Carolina and the southwestern end <br />of Virginia. These areas, hereafter referred to as the eastern TVA region, con- <br />tain the highest elevation headwater regions of the streams that form the <br />Tennessee River. Additional rainfall in,these,watersheds could be used several <br />times during passage through the many reservoirs in the TVA system. <br /> <br />1 <br />