My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00379
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00379
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:37:18 PM
Creation date
4/16/2008 10:30:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Potential Opportunities for Precipitation Augmentation in the Eastern Tennessee Valley
Date
2/1/1988
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
220
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />,I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Figure 8.3 Douglas reservoir inflow statistics (cubic feet per <br />second). Bar graphs are actual statistics for median, <br />lower quartile, and lower decile flows. Line graph is <br />calculated zero precipitation or base flow from <br />Asheville-Douglas precipitation-inflow regression <br /> <br />an a 1 Y5 is. ...................... 90 <br /> <br />Figure 8.4 Schematic representation of hydrology enhancement <br />scheme. Dark shading shows portion of the <br />hydrology enhanced. ................. 93 <br /> <br />Figure 8.5 Flow increases in percent versus week for Watauga reser- <br />voir. Traces shown with connecting lines are those <br />selected for uses in simulation to cover the range of <br />potential increases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 <br /> <br />Figure 8.6 Percent flow increase by week for all augmented reser- <br />voirs using the HIGH enhancement scenario. . . . . . . 98 <br /> <br />Figure 8.7 Percent flow increase by week for all augmented reser- <br />voirs using the MEDIUM(+) enhancement scenario. 98 <br /> <br />Figure 8.8 Percent flow increase by week for all augmented reser~ <br />voirs using the MEDIUM(-) enhancement scenario. 99 <br /> <br />Figure 8.9 Percent flow increase by week for all augmented reser- <br />voirs using th~ LOW enhancement scenario. . 99 <br /> <br />Figure 8.10 Total number of cases suspended from seeding for all <br />reservoirs at the upper 10 percent and upper 5 percent <br />flow suspension levels. Maximum possible number of cases <br />is 924 (84 years X 11 reservoirs). . . . . . . . .100 <br /> <br />Figure 8.11 <br />Figure 8.12 <br />Figure 8.13 <br />Figure 8.14 <br />Figure 8.15 <br /> <br />Increase in Cherokee reservoir elevation level on <br />week 22 resulting from HIGH augmentation. . . .104 <br /> <br />Increase in Douglas reservoir elevation level on <br />week 22 resulting from HIGH augmentation. .104 <br /> <br />Increase in Norris reservoir elevation level on <br />week 22 resulting from HIGH augmentation. .105 <br /> <br />Increase in Fontana reservoir elevation level on <br />week 22 resulting from simulated augmentation. . .105 <br /> <br />Distribution of annual energy cost impacts resulting <br />from the HIGH augmentation scenario. Impacts are <br />in 1988 dollars. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .108 <br /> <br />xii. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.