Laserfiche WebLink
<br />is due to their great depth. No water would be expected in the colder, <br /> <br />upper parts of these PETs (T < -16C) if the aircraft observations of <br /> <br />STORM 9 are representative. <br /> <br />Thus water content in the lower parts of <br /> <br />A PETs may be higher than the quoted figure. The low average liquid water <br /> <br />content in C PETs is due to the azimuthally localized nature of the <br /> <br />liquid. Higher contents would be expected in the vicinity of the cells. <br /> <br />Aircraft observations in STORM 14 showed significant amounts of super- <br /> <br />cooled liquid' water in small 'cumulus clouds at temperatures as cold as <br /> <br />-20C. NP PETs are shallow but contain substantial total amounts of liquid <br /> <br />water. Their liquid water contents are thus relatively high. <br /> <br />At the detector on the upper slope of the Tushar Mtns supercooled <br /> <br />liquld water was. observe.d a small fraction of the,~!.'!I,e. <br />------------'-""-"-" -"~.. <br /> <br />NP PETs were <br /> <br />responsible for most (45%) of the observations and for the highest con- <br /> <br />tents (- 0.56 g m-3). <br /> <br />C PETs made the next highest contribution. <br /> <br />Supercooled liquid water at the surface appears to occur only when there <br /> <br />is direct or inferred evidence of a precipitation echo aloft. Comparison <br /> <br />of the flux of supercooled liquid water at the detector integrated over a <br /> <br />STORM to that of precipitation shows that the ratio is largest for <br /> <br />NP PETs. NP PETs may thus provide a significant precipitation augmen- <br /> <br />tat ion potential. <br /> <br />c. <br /> <br />Spatial distribution of supercooled liquid water. <br /> <br />The spatial <br /> <br />distribution of supercooled liquid water has a strong orographic depen- <br /> <br />dence. I ntegrated liquid water for C or NP PETs increases by a factor of <br /> <br />2.0 or 1.7, respectively, from 5-10 km west of the radiometer site to <br /> <br />5-10 km east. The orographic increase for A PETs is only a factor of 1.3. <br /> <br />There is no reason to expect these orographic increases not to continue <br /> <br />xxiv <br />