Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Bureau of Reclamation Responses to Comments <br /> <br />76-10 <br /> <br />exceed the prevailing evaporation rate appreciably. The text on <br />page 3-34 contrasts expected results of widespread and prolonged use of <br />precipitation management with probable IIno discernible impact on ground <br />waterll from the research program. Presumably this is the reason for <br />the apparent confusion of impact prediction on pages 3-23 and 3-24; how- <br />ever, the discussion should be clarified. We suggest that, at least for <br />the specific project areas J additional detail concerning the occurrence <br />of ground water and in particular the recharge aspects of significant <br />ground-water resources involved should be considered <br /> <br />DES <br /> <br />(~~.c. (j'~f.. <br /> <br />~-~ '--I i,c, <br /> <br />/:?- <br /> <br />Direc tor <br /> <br />~(".'\',i._~t <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br />.... <br />0\ <br />