Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Bureau of Reclamation Responses to Conunents <br /> <br />ADDII:ESS ONlV THE DlRECTOR. <br />fiSH AND WILDLIfE SERVICE <br /> <br />United States Department of the Interior <br /> <br />-I-,J-IIV <br />'3-~f('t.d-;"'~:"'''' ,4 <br />r' <br /> <br />I'T';}-1 AND W FE SERVICE <br />WASHINGTON, D,C. 2U240 <br /> <br />June 1976 <br /> <br />J;n Reply Refer <br />1,,: FWS/OBS <br /> <br />1//7 <br /> <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />Dr. Archie M. Kahant Chief <br />Division of Atmospheric Water Resources <br /> <br />To <br /> <br />Management <br /> <br />Office of Biological Services <br /> <br />Ac ting Chief <br /> <br />From <br /> <br />- t.\tmospheric Water Resources <br /> <br />Draft Environmental Statement <br />Management Program <br /> <br />Subject <br /> <br />No response <br /> <br />the Atmospheric <br /> <br />In general t we encourage the experimental approach proposed by the <br />Atmospheric Water Resources Management Program. This approach will allow <br />the early identification of impacts t both positive and negative. It should <br />also provide a sound basis for monitoring long term ecological changes. <br />Project Skywater should maintain a staff or consulting capability to <br />actively evaluate the impacts of this new technology on fish and wildlife <br />resourcest including related habitat. <br /> <br />We appreciate the opportunity to review the draft EIS on <br />Water Resources Management Program. <br /> <br />:00:: <br />I <br />.... <br />~ <br /> <br />It is acknowledged that additional applied research would make it <br />possible to analyze the impacts of increased precipitation on veg- <br />etation and fish and wildlife in greater detail. It is believed <br />that the presentation made in this Environmental Statement ade- <br />quately represents the present status of knowledge concerning <br />these environmental impacts. <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />The draft EIS reflects a high level of understanding of atmospheric systems <br />and hydrology. The impacts of increased precipitation on natural ecosystems <br />should be handled with equal sophistication. The draft EIS provides excellent <br />general descriptions and species li::>t.::> for the. proposed study sites. Expected <br />impacts of increased precipitation on vegetation and fish and wildlife t <br />however t should be analyzed in more detail. This may require the support <br />of applied research in the event the ecological information is not available <br />An active monitoring program should also be included to measure ecological <br />changes and rela ted impac ts <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />The reader is referred to the response made on this topic to a <br />similar comment by the Deputy Chief, Forest Service. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Another significant concern of the Fish and Wildlife Service is the impact <br />from a policy perspective - of opening wilderness areas to field operations <br />of the type proposed. Specific attention should be given to the precedent <br />of "opening" the wilderness areas to major resource management experiments <br />with ecological implications. The EIS should also review alternative means <br />of access to proposed instrumentation. A position paper or chapter on the <br />"wilderness" issue is warranted in our opinion. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />::~!.': <br /> <br />Q;'~~'O'-UT/O"'~ <br />~ ~~ ~ <br />(j ~ <br />~ !P <br />7-p. $ <br />1;>78_1910 <br />