Laserfiche WebLink
<br />834 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br />VOLUME 34 <br /> <br />A Comparison of Seeded and Nonseeded Orographic Cloud Simulations <br />with an Explicit Cloud Model <br /> <br />MICHAEL P. MEYERS, PAUL J. DEMoTT, AND WILLIAM R. COTTON <br />Department of Atmospheric Science. Colorado State University. Fort Collins. Colorado <br />(Manuscript received 21 December 1993, in final form 14 September 1994) <br /> <br />ABSTRACT <br /> <br />Ice initiation by specific cloud seeding aerosols, quantified in laboratory studies, has been formulated for use <br />in mesoscale numerical cloud models. This detailed approach, which explicitly represents artificial ice nuclei <br />activation, is unique for mesoscale simulations of cloud seeding. This new scheme was applied in the simulation <br />of an orographic precipitation event seeded with the specific aerosols on 18 December 1986 from the Sierra <br />Cooperative Pilot Project using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). Total ice concentrations <br />formed following seeding agreed well with observations. RAMS's three-dimensional results showed that the <br />new seeding parameterization impacted the microphysical fields producing increased pristine ice crystal, aggregate, <br />and graupel mass downstream of the seeded regions. Pristine ice concentration also increased as much as an <br />order of magnitude in some locations due to seeding. Precipitation augmentation due to the seeding was 0.1- <br />0.7 mm, similar to values inferred from the observations. Simulated precipitation enhancement occurred due <br />to increased precipitation efficiency since no large precipitation deficits occurred in the simulation. These maxima <br />were collocated with regions of supercooled liquid water where nucleation by man-made ice nucleus aerosols <br />was optimized. <br /> <br />1. Introduction <br /> <br />Precipitation processes in cloud systems in the Sierra <br />Nevada have been investigated for many years because <br />of their importance to the water resources of the area. <br />The emphasis of these programs, such as the Sierra <br />Cooperative Pilot Project (SCPP) (Reynolds and Den- <br />nis 1986), is to examine and quantify the microphysical <br />and dynamical properties of these orographic cloud <br />systems and to determine if weather modification is a <br />viable alternative for enhancing precipitation in these <br />areas. <br />This study applied an artificial ice formation param- <br />eterization specific to the ice nucleating aerosols used <br />during a portion of the SCPP program for use in a <br />detailed cloud model. The nucleation processes re- <br />sponsible for ice formation were quantified based on <br />detailed laboratory studies performed at Colorado State <br />University (CSU). A preliminary seeding simulation <br />that employed a microphysical parcel model was used <br />to demonstrate the details of ice formation imple- <br />mented for artificial ice nucleus aerosols into the me- <br />soscale model and to investigate expected dominant <br />ice formation modes. The artificial nucleation param- <br />eterization was then added to the Regional Atmo- <br />spheric Modeling System (RAMS) developed at CSU, <br /> <br />Corresponding author address: Dr. Michael P. Meyers, Department <br />of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO <br />80523. <br /> <br />@ 1995 American Meteorological Society <br /> <br />which was used to examine the 18 December 1986 <br />seeded orographic cloud system from SCPP. The W orId <br />Meteorological Organization's (WMO) Third Inter- <br />national Cloud Modeling Workshop (WMO 1994) <br />provided the motivation for examining this case study. <br />Three-dimensional (3D) nested-grid simulations were <br />employed to fully evaluate the microphysical evolution <br />of clouds in both seeded and nonseeded numerical <br />studies and allowed comparison to the observed struc- <br />ture of the clouds. <br /> <br />2. Background <br /> <br />a. Historical <br /> <br />Numerical cloud models have been used by a num- <br />ber of researchers to simulate the effects of various <br />seeding techniques in different types of clouds. Al- <br />though one must treat the transfer oflaboratory results <br />into numerical models with some caution, DeMott <br />( 1994) has summarized evidence from atmospheric <br />seeding tests that the laboratory results on ice initiation <br />processes do correlate with observed cloud micro- <br />physical effects in many circumstances. The schemes <br />employed by various researchers to initialize ice for- <br />mation by man-made ice nucleus aerosols have varied <br />widely. In some cases these schemes have been based <br />on a combination of theory and laboratory results that <br />are not necessarily compatible. Also, due to the lack <br />of information, the schemes are seldom specific to the <br />nucleant used in a particular operational or research <br />