My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00318 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00318 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:54 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 2:39:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Project Name
Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project
Title
A Comparison of Seeded and Nonseeded Orographic Cloud Simulations with and Explicit Cloud Model
Prepared By
Michael P. Meyers, Paul J. DeMott and William R. Cotton
Date
4/4/1995
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />842 <br /> Grid 3 <br /> 90 <br /> 85 <br /> 80 <br /> 75 <br />E <br />.:,t; <br /> 70 <br />>- <br /> 65 <br /> 60 <br /> 55 <br /> <br />JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY <br /> <br /> <br />100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 <br />X ( km) <br /> <br />FIa. 6. The areal extent of the seedline as viewed from above (de- <br />scribed in text) on grid 3 at t = 1900 UTC (at seeding), t = 1930 <br />UTC (0.5 h after seeding), and at t = 2000 UTC (1.0 h after seeding). <br /> <br />experiment. Initialization of seeded aerosol concentra- <br />tions was given in section 3b. The location of the sim- <br />ulated seedline was determined from the elevation and <br />temperatures of the initial seedline (Deshler et al. <br />1990). The simulated seedline was nearly 37 km long <br />and placed at the appropriate grid locations between <br />the -60C and -70C isotherms. <br /> <br />c. Model results <br /> <br />It was important that the model simulated the nat- <br />ural precipitation processes properly before seeding was <br />initiated. Figure 5 shows x-z cross sections of a few <br />microphysical fields from the nonseeded simulation <br />that can be compared to the observed structure shown <br />in Fig. 1. The simulated pristine ice mixing ratio on <br />grid 2 shows the ice cloud extending from 2 to 5 km <br />MSL with peak amounts up to 0.2 g kg-I (Fig. 5a). <br />Predicted peak concentrations of pristine ice crystals <br />are 10-25 L -I (not shown), which were close to ob- <br />served values of 10-30 L -I. In Fig. 1 the observations <br />showed an upper and lower cloud layer with precipi- <br />tation occurring between the two layers at 4 km MSL. <br />This feature would be quite difficult to predict in the <br />model, however, since any precipitation falling out of <br />the upper cloud would have appeared as one of the <br />precipitating categories. Therefore the simulated struc- <br />ture predicted the pristine ice mixing cloud to extend <br />from 2 to 5 km MSL. Aggregation was observed across <br />most of the lower cloud but mostly confined below 3 <br />km MSL with peak values near 0.07 g kg-I. Simulated <br />values of aggregate mixing ratio shown in Fig. 5b in- <br /> <br />VOLUME 34 <br /> <br />dicate that the aggregates were confined to below 3.5 <br />km MSL, but peak values were 0.01 g kg -I, which was <br />less than the observed values. The graupel and rain <br />mixing ratio fields are shown in Figs. 5c and 5d. These <br />fields show melting precipitation below 1.5 km MSL <br />in the form of graupel (partially melted pristine ice <br />crystals are converted to graupel in the model) and <br />rain occurring over the lower portion of the barrier. <br />Peak values were 0.2 g kg-I for graupel mixing ratio <br />and 0.05 g kg-I for rain mixing ratio. These simulated <br />fields were close to the location of the higher reflectiv- <br />ities associated with an apparent bright band, resulting <br />from melting ice particles, observed in this region (Fig. <br />1 ). Another area of graupel was predicted over the bar- <br />rier crest. However, this region was located lower in <br />elevation and was smaller in magnitude than observed. <br />After demonstrating the reasonableness of the sim- <br />ulation, the effects of releasing ice nucleus aerosols in <br />the simulation can be examined. The initial seedline <br />is shown in Fig. 6 at 1900 UTe. This figure depicts the <br />areal extent of the artificial ice nuclei plume viewed <br />from above at different times to show the relative ad- <br />vection and dispersion of the seeding material. The <br />plume-edge concentration value was arbitrarily set to <br />10 L -I. The relative advection speed of the plume in <br />the simulation was 10 m S-I, which was comparable <br />to the advection speed ofthe plumes in the observations <br />( 10-15 m s -I ). By 2000 UTC the seed started to exit <br />the northern border of grid 3. <br />The simulated pristine ice crystal concentrations <br />from grid 3 at 3000 m MSL are shown in Fig. 7. This <br />height was used since it was in proximity to the location <br />of the seed release. At 1920 UTC, 20 min after the seed <br />was introduced, the pristine ice crystal concentration <br />field exhibited a similar structure as the seedline (Fig. <br />6), with a broad area of greater than 20 L -I. Peak <br />values were 120 L -I (Fig. 7a), which is somewhat <br />higher than the peak pristine ice crystal concentrations <br />observed (greater than 100 L -I ). The location of the <br />pristine ice crystal maxima was just downstream of a <br />broad region of SL W seen in Fig. 8, which enhanced <br />artificial ice nucleation. The overall structure of the <br />pristine concentration field advected to the northeast <br />by 1940 UTC (Fig. 7b), with a broad area of greater <br />than 20 L -I , a western peak of 60 L -I , and an eastern <br />peak of 110 L -I . Peak concentrations decreased to 60 <br />L -) by 2000 UTC (Fig. 7c). Simulated pristine ice <br />crystal concentration maxima from the nonseeded run <br />during this period was 10 L -I (Fig. 7d). <br />The effect of cloud seeding on other microphysical <br />quantities was also quite significant. Figure 9 shows <br />the predicted pristine ice mixing ratio fields from the <br />seeded and nonseeded runs at 2000 UTe. In the seeded <br />run the pristine ice mixing ratio field extended over a <br />broader area than the nonseeded run, and peak values <br />of the seeded run (0.35 g kg -I) were nearly twice as <br />much as the nonseeded run. There was more graupel <br />mass (not shown) being produced in the seeded run <br /> <br />\., <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.