My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00317 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00317 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:49 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 2:39:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
A Comparison of the Potential of Cloud Seeding to Enhance Mountain Snowpack in Colorado During Dry, Normal and Wet Winters
Date
1/1/1983
State
CO
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />be used to determine characteristics of the air mass over the state, <br />relial'x:::e upon them presents two problems. <br /> <br />First, scientists disagree as to how well storms can be identified <br />from soundiIl3s. Although new techniques ernployiIl3 radiometry have shown <br />promise in identifyiIl3 storms and seediIl3 potential, data to conduct a <br />clirnatologyusing these techniques are not available. <br /> <br />Second, soundings are taken too rarely and at too few locations to <br />provide enough data to conduct a comprehensive climatology. Soundings are <br />taken routinely twice daily by the National Weather Service at only two <br />locations in Colorado (Denver and Grand Junction). Thus, only educated <br />guesses can be made about conditions in the upper atmosphere over the <br />thousarrls of square miles between stations. Storms can also slip by <br />umetected between soundings taken l2 hours apart. Additional soundings <br />are available from field experiments in Colorado, but their period of <br />record is too short. Statistical considerations dictate that observations <br />be made over periods of time lOIl3 enough to allow confidence in results. <br />Also,. collecting data over a long period ensures that dry, normal, am wet <br />years are included in the sample. <br /> <br />Data with the areal coverage, spatial resolution am leIl3th of re<::ord <br />necessary for a comprehensi ve assessment of storms am seeding <br />opportunities do not exist. '!he conclusions of this study, are tentative <br />and subject to revision as additional data become available. In our <br />opinion, the best data available are interpolations of soumiIl3s taken by <br />the National Weather Service at two sites in Colorado am at four sites in <br />borderin:j' states. '!hese interpolations, corrputed by Dr. Owen Rhea as part <br />of his dissertation in atlrospheric sciences at Colorado State University <br />(Rhea, 1978), consist of values at ten border points around the portion of <br />Colorado west of 10SW lOIl3itude for the winter ronths (November 1 through <br />April 30) from 1961-62 through 1973-74. <br /> <br />Interpolation points are shown in Figure l. Before interpolatin:j, <br />Rhea corre<::ted the relative humidity profiles for lag effects of the <br />various sensors used during the 13-year period. These data were made <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I ! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.