Laserfiche WebLink
<br />produced major flooding along the Sacramento River. Based on the analysis for the Trinity <br />Dam operating criteria (Reclamation, 1979), this STORM was also the wettest on record for <br />the Trinity Watershed dating back to the early 1900s. AB mentioned above, this STORM was <br />verified by the COF gauge. The average duration of all "good" STORMS for COF was 18 h. <br />Figure 4.14 shows that after STORM totals reach 12 in., the duration begins to level off at <br />96 h. For COF, the longest duration STORM was the wettest STORM on record, beginning <br />on December 18, 1964, lasting 214 h, and producing 18.9 in. of precipitation. <br /> <br />Five of the top ten wettest STORMs at SHA have occurred in November. Four of the top ten <br />STORMs at COF have also occurred in November. [However, in looking at peak inflows to <br />Lake Shasta, the hi~hest observed for these November STORMs was 85,000 ft3/s (maximum <br />of record 216,000 ft Is)]. Each of these STORMs produced over 14 in. of precipitation. A <br />STORM that began on November 27, 1971, dropped 19.5 in. of precipitation. A peak inflow <br />of only 30,000 ft3/s was measured at SHA. This information will be important when <br />considering suspension. <br /> <br />4.1.4.1 Suspension Criteria Applied to Hours of Precipitation <br /> <br />Before results of water year hourly precipitation are presented, suspension criteria must be <br />determined. This procedure will allow determination of those STORMs that should not be <br />considered as potential opportunities for seeding. Suspension criteria are established to avoid <br />situations in which seeding might either directly affect or be perceived to affect threatening <br />weather situations. Based on information contained in the Shasta Dam Operations Manual <br />(COE, 1977) and discussions with region personnel (John Burke, pers. comm.), the following <br />suspension criteria were established for the Shasta Watershed. <br /> <br />1. The reservoir water level is encroached more than 25 pct into flood reservation and <br />releases exceed the power plant capacity of 17,000 ft3/s. <br /> <br />2. Peak inflows,exceed 70,000 ft3/s. <br /> <br />Two other parameters were considered as criteria but it was felt the criteria chosen above <br />would cover these situations. The two criteria not chosen were 1) 24 h precipitation amounts <br />greater than 4 in. at SHA and 2) flow in the Sacramento River at Red Bluff exceeding <br />100,000 ft3/s. ' <br /> <br />A separate set of criteria had to be established for the .Trinity. Because Clair Engle Reservoir <br />does not operate as a flood control reservoir, criteria were developed based on the Safety of <br />Dams criteria established after the January 1974 flood. A review of this event (Reclamation, <br />1979) established safe storage levels for Trinity Reservoir during the winter months based <br />on powerplant capacities. The acceptable storage levels as instituted in 1975 are as follows: <br /> <br />Period . <br /> <br />Maximum Target Storage <br /> <br />N ov- Dec <br />Jan <br />Feb <br />Mar <br /> <br />1,850,000 acre-ft <br />1,900,000 <br />2,000,000 <br />2,100,000 <br /> <br />30 <br />