Laserfiche WebLink
<br />time. Given the limited amount of SLW availabll~ and the warm supercooled temperatures <br />for particle growth, seeding is not expected to increase precipitation rates by more than 1 mm <br />h-1, with a typical range of from 0.1 to 0.6 mm h-1.. <br /> <br />Ground seeding with AgI to increase precipitation along the west slope of the Sierra may only <br />be appropriate in about 20 pct of the storms during a given winter. The main restriction is <br />the height of the -6 oc level, which is often too high (2800 m) to allow ice nucleation and <br />crystal fallout prior to the treated air passing over the crest. <br /> <br />Based on the SCPP results, a design for a snowpack augmentation program for the California <br />Department of Water Resources in the Middle Fork Feather River Basin has been completed. <br />The design emphasizes the use of a fast acting nucleant released from remote controlled <br />densely spaced ground generators that could use the SL W found near the crest between 0 and <br />-50C. Reynolds (1989,1991) describes the use ofliquid propane as an effective seeding agent <br />for use in this particular project area. Liquid propane must be dispensed directly into <br />supercooled cloud or into air at or above ice saturation. Therefore, its application is limited <br />to locations where the crystals produced can grow for 30 min or more and fall out before <br />passing into the subsidence region downwind from the crest. ' <br /> <br />As the results above suggest, the methodology for seeding a specific target area depends on <br />many factors. The meteorological and topographi.c conditions for the area of interest must <br />be examined before a final design can be determined. The following sections provide this <br />analysis for the Shasta and Trinity Watersheds. <br /> <br />4. ANALYSIS OF PRECIPITATION DATA FOR <br />THE SHASTA-TRINITY WATERSHEDS <br /> <br />As was described in the preceding section on SCPP results, a close relationship exists <br />between periods of precipitation and periods of SLW. The same mechanism that produces <br />precipitation (mainly large-scale weather features producing moist upslope flow over <br />mountainous terrain) produces SL W. Because of limited SL W observations over the Shasta <br />and Trinity Watersheds, analysis of precipitation data may provide insight into the potential <br />seeding opportunities available from year to year based on the historical precipitation record. <br />Both daily and hourly records were analyzed. <br /> <br />Daily precipitation data are normally taken by cooperative observers. Readings of <br />precipitation amounts are made at a given time each day. Hourly precipitation amounts are <br />normally derived from an automated gauge capable of recording the hourly amounts via an <br />analog or digital recording device. Daily precipitation records are more complete than the <br />hourly data because of loss of data from the hourly recording device caused by recording <br />failure. Both data sets have been analyzed to determine seeding potential. <br /> <br />4.1 Precipitation Analyses <br /> <br />4.1.1 Shasta Watershed <br /> <br />The drainage area above SHA (Shasta Dam) consists of 17,262 km2 of mountain and plateau <br />area at the head of the Sacramento Valley. Elevations range from 180 m to over 4300 m at <br />Mt. Shasta. About 65 pct of the mountainous area lies below 1200 m (in comparison, the <br /> <br />17 <br />