My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WMOD00312 (2)
CWCB
>
Weather Modification
>
DayForward
>
WMOD00312 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/28/2009 2:35:27 PM
Creation date
4/15/2008 2:38:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Weather Modification
Title
Cloud Seeding Feasibility for the Shasta-Trinity Watershed
Date
12/1/1993
Weather Modification - Doc Type
Report
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />3. SUMMARY OF THE SCPP RESULTS RELEVANT <br />TO THE SHASTA-TRINITY WATERSHED <br /> <br />3.1 Introduction <br /> <br />During the winters from 1976-77 through 1986-87 (excluding the 1980-81 winter), <br />Reclamation sponsored the SCPP. Extensive physical measurements were conducted in <br />winter mountain clouds over the ARB (American River Basin) to develop a cloud seeding <br />technology for increasing precipitation on the watershed. SCPP involved the use of remote- <br />sensing devices, in situ observations, and application of numerical models in conducting <br />exploratory seeding trials. Reynolds and Dennis (1986), and Reynolds (1988) describe the <br />SCPP and the major results obtained. Although funding was terminated before a complete <br />analysis of the data or a final report of the SCPP could be completed, analyses performed <br />provided some general conclusions relevant to this Feasibility Report. These results follow. <br /> <br />3.2 SLW Studies <br /> <br />. SLW is necessary for seeding to affect precipitation. SCPP applied various methods for <br />determining SLW in clouds over the ARB. Aircraft mounted liquid water probes provided the <br />magnitude and areal distribution of SLW; however, these results were restricted in both <br />space and time. Safety considerations eliminated aircraft sampling at low elevation near the <br />mountain where extensive SLW water existed. Required pilot rest periods limited aircraft <br />hours of operation. The highest liquid water concentrations were found by aircraft 30 to 65 <br />kIn upwind from the crest in cumulus clouds forming in the post cold-frontal airmass (Heggli <br />et al., 1983). Analysis of aircraft data suggests that some of this liquid water is used in the <br />natural precipitation process prior to passing over the crest of the Sierra. <br /> <br />A better method of sampling SLW is vertically integrating the SLW content using a ground- <br />based platform as the air passes out of the watershed. A dual-channel microwave radiometer, <br />capable of remotely integrating the amount of SLW throughout cloud depth, provides these <br />measurements. The radiometer frequencies are specifically tuned to measure the emitted <br />radiation from both water vapor and condensed liquid. The radiometer is positioned at <br />elevations above the freezing level so that the liquid water measured is supercooled. Given <br />these conditions, the radiometer provides continuous observations ofSLW throughout a storm <br />instead of being confined to a single aircraft flight track. The radiometer normally operated <br />during the SCPP 3-mo field program, January through March. With the exception of March <br />1983, when the radiometer was located at BLU (Blue Canyon) (1500 m), it operated about <br />5 kIn west of the crest at Kingvale (1750 m), figure 3.1. <br /> <br />During the period March 1983 through early January 1987, about 12 winter months ofliquid . <br />water data were collected near the crest of the Sierra Nevada. For this 12-mo period, 775 <br />h of acceptable SLW were observed (radiometer data were excluded ifthe temperature at the <br />observation site was above 0 OC). These observations were summarized by Heggli and <br />Rauber (1988). The main conclusions were that SLW develops during the passage of large- <br />scale weather features. The combination oflarge-scale vertical motions associated with a cold <br />front, and the forced ascent of this moist air over the mountain barrier, causes condensation <br />and SLW production. Periods of SLW production vary considerably depending on storm <br />trajectories (west to east moving storms vs north to south moving storms) and position with <br />respect to the cold front. In general, SLW was concentrated in the lowest kilometer aboveb <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.